Why Google bans ad blockers, but is actually fine with ad-blocking browsers

Ad blockers are nothing new. They’ve existed as web browser extensions for many years and a few Android apps even do it across the OS. However, there’s an interesting little conundrum. The Play Store allows web browsers with ad-block, but not system-wide ad blockers. It seems hypocritical at first — both types of apps block ads — but there is a difference.

Let’s take a look.


best android browsers featured image

The difference is key

Let’s start with the fundamental difference between web browsers with ad blocking and ad blockers as a whole. A web browser with ad block only blocks advertising within its own app. A proper ad-block app only blocks advertising in other apps. That’s a small, but extremely important difference.

Apps that disrupt, damage, or otherwise mess with how other apps work are strictly prohibited in the Google Play Store. You can find the relevant rule here. If you read down to the bullet list on that link, the very first rule specifically uses ad blockers as an example. This same ruling also bans apps like Lucky Patcher and other hack tools that give you freemium game purchases for free:

We don’t allow apps that interfere with, disrupt, damage, or access in an unauthorized manner the user’s device, other devices or computers, servers, networks, application programming interfaces (APIs), or services, including but not limited to other apps on the device, any Google service, or an authorized carrier’s network.

Tons of apps and games use ads to generate most of their revenue. In an interview with Android Authority, the developers of Alto’s Adventure theorized that the average person on Android would rather watch an ad than pay for anything. Those developers earn 99 percent of their revenue from ads and a paltry one percent from in-app purchases. If ad block, Lucky Patcher, and other similar tools existed on mobile like they do on the web, that ratio would be vastly different and earnings vastly lower. Even the developer of Flappy Bird made $50,000 per day solely on advertisements.

Even if the user was never going to tap the ad, impressions — when someone just views an ad — still generate a good deal of money for developers (read more about how ad impressions work here).

It’s understandable why the rule is in place. When developers get paid, Google also gets paid. Ad blockers and apps like Lucky Patcher mess with the revenue streams of both. A rule against such behavior makes perfect sense. This rule also prevents a lot of other bad behavior like bypassing the system power management, abusive API usage, and apps that circumvent security protections. This rule also affects a lot of root user apps, which is rather unfortunate.

The rule that bans ad blockers is the same rule that bans Lucky Patcher and similar apps.


Ad blockers on Android

Google controls ads on Google Play

Google seems to care about the ad experience on Android. There is a whole section in the Developer Policy Center specifically for advertising. The company bans the following types of ads and behaviors:

  • Deceptive Ad Placement: Developers cannot make ads that act as part of the app’s UI. If an app has a button that looks like it does something within the app, but just opens an ad up instead, the Play Store will ban the app.
  • Lock Screen Monetization: Apps can’t use the lock screen for ad placement unless it’s a lock screen app. Alto’s Adventure can’t show ads on your lock screen, but something like Hi Locker can.
  • Disruptive Ads: Developers cannot use full page (also known as interstitial) ads with no clear way to dismiss the ad.
  • Interference with Apps, Device Functionality, and so on: Advertisements cannot affect device functionality, other apps, or basically anything else. Ads must be in the app that provides them. This is basically the same rule preventing ad blockers in the first place, but for advertising. Ad-blockers can’t affect how other apps work and neither can advertisements. At least it’s fair.
  • Inappropriate Ads: Advertising that doesn’t follow a strict ethical code are banned. For instance, you can’t put dating website ads in a kid’s game.
  • Android Advertising ID rules: There are also a bunch of rules when using the Android Advertising ID. You can read all of those here.

These rules don’t get rid of all of the annoying ads — you still get full page video ads with sound — but they limit the worst offenders. On the internet there are no such rules for advertisers.

If you see or know of an app breaking one of these rules, fill out this form and report them.


Firefox Focus ad blockers trackers

Let’s go back to web browsers with ad-block

Google could put a blanket ban on ad blocking in all of its forms, but there really isn’t any reason to. Google isn’t actually against ad blocking, it’s against apps on Android affecting how other apps on Android work. It’s more of a security issue than an ethical one. Even Google Chrome has ad blocking.

There are a bunch of other potential reasons why web browsers get to stay and native ad blockers have to go. The App Store also allows web browsers with ad block and Apple’s Safari has ad and tracker blocking for better privacy. You can, of course, get desktop level browser ad blocking on Windows, Linux, and MacOS. Thus, even Google’s biggest competitor allows web browsers with ad blockers. It would be silly for Google to be the odd man out, to so to speak.

We don’t really think that’s why any of that is the case, though. All the evidence points to ad blockers affecting how other apps work. There doesn’t seem to be any indication that Google cares one way or another about the actual practice of ad blocking.


Here’s how to block ads on your Android phone

Chrome will start blocking disruptive ads tomorrow – here’s how it’ll work

As long as Google prevents apps from messing with one another, ad blockers will continue to be banned from the Play Store. It’s fine to be mad about. Again, we’re not defending or criticizing the behavior. We just wanted to know why.

Sound off in the comments if you want to talk about it further!

Source: Android Zone

The post Why Google bans ad blockers, but is actually fine with ad-blocking browsers appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Secure a Radix .tech domain name for 10 years and save hundreds

Radix Domain Name

Got a new business? Don’t try searching for a .com domain for it as you won’t find anything that’s worth paying for. Try, instead, a Radix ‘.tech’ domain subscription offered at the severely discounted price of just $49.99 for a 10-year term.

The .com extension has run its course. Virtually every domain name that makes any sense has been purchased either by someone who is using it or, more commonly, sitting on it to resell for a huge profit.

Designed specially for people who live and work in the tech sphere, a Radix .tech domain will ensure you have a great and sensible website name for years to come without having to resort to paying thousands of dollars to some net-based squatter.

And, if you’re worried that you’ll be alone in the .tech revolution, think again. Giant corporations like Viacom and even the Consumer Electronics Show have already made the switch. If it’s good enough for them, it’s good enough for everyone.

Here’s what you get:

  • You can register and use a .tech domain name for a period of 10 years.
  • Easily build your brand with a quality domain that categorizes your business.
  • A .tech domain communicates your passion for technology to your audience.
  • Brand your business better across the entirety of the internet.

Start building your website with a Radix .tech domain today. Pay just $49.99 for a 10-year subscription and save 90 percent off the regular price. One and five-year subscriptions are available too, also at huge discounts.

 

Radix ‘.tech’ Domain Subscriptions – $49.99

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB.

Source: Android Zone

The post Secure a Radix .tech domain name for 10 years and save hundreds appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

What is 5G, and what can we expect from it?

The world’s first 5G networks switch on this year, promising faster data speeds and lower latency to consumers. In addition, 5G opens up avenues to new industrial applications and is a critical element to build widely connected “smart cities.” 5G is the next step to provide better networking in our increasingly technological world.

Read Next: Forget mmWave, Wi-Fi is the real 5G

Around the world, companies and governments are ironing out the finer points of how to bring 5G mobile communication to the masses. If you’ve been wondering what is 5G, this is the current state of the industry and what to expect.

What is 5G? It’s all in the details

5G, just like 4G technology, is an evolving standard, which is planned for and created by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) and International Telecommunications Union (ITU). The ITU’s IMT-2020 preparations and 3GPP Release 15 specification lay the foundations for early 5G technology and rollouts.

The specification outlines 5G technology required to build these futuristic networks. High-frequency mmWave base stations, sub-6GHz WiFi-esque small and medium cells, beamforming, and massive multiple-input and multiple-output (MIMO) are just some of the more common technologies talked about. But there are also major changes to data encoding and infrastructure network slicing that are seldom talked about. These are all new technological introductions compared to today’s 4G LTE networks.

Editor’s Pick

The 5G standard is split into two key parts – Non-Standalone (NSA) and New Radio (NR). Today’s first 5G networks will be based on NSA, and are planned to eventually transition over to SA once that part of the specification is finalized in the coming years. Complicating the situation further, U.S. carrier Verizon has its own version of 5G to accelerate its rollout. However, Verizon plans to adopt the mainstream 5G later.

5G networks are built from a wide range of technologies

5G technology explained

The most commonly talked 5G technology is mmWave, but carriers will also be utilizing new spectrum in the sub-6GHz WiFi region, low bands below 1GHz, and existing 4G LTE bands too. There is currently lots of unused high-frequency spectrum, known as millimeter wave. The higher the frequency the more bandwidth is available, but the trade-off is that this technology has a shorter range than lower frequencies used in 4G LTE.

The overall idea is to greatly increase the amount of spectrum available by combining the pros and cons of all these different frequencies. Combining more spectrum with carrier aggregation (sending data over multiple pieces of spectrum) allows for more bandwidth and much faster speeds for consumers.

5G spectrum and technologies, mmWave, sub-6GHz, and LTE

5G greatly increases the amount of spectrum used to send and receive data.

Here’s a breakdown of the key 5G technology terms that you need to know.

  • mmWave – very high frequency between 17 and 100GHz and high bandwidth for fast data. Most carriers are targeting use in the 18-24GHz range. Reasonably short-range technology that will be used in densely populated areas.
  • Sub-6GHz – operates in WiFi-like frequencies between 3 and 6GHz. Can be deployed in small cell hubs for indoor use or more powerful outdoor base stations to cover medium range much like existing 4G LTE. Most 5G spectrum will be found here.
  • Low-band – very low frequencies below 800MHz. Covers very long distances and is omnidirectional to provide blanket backbone coverage.
  • Beamforming – used in mmWave and sub-6GHz base stations to direct waveforms towards consumer devices, such as bouncing waves off buildings. A key technology in overcoming the range and direction limitations of high-frequency waveforms.
  • Massive MIMO – multiple antennas on base stations serve multiple end-user devices at once. Designed to make high-frequency networks much more efficient and can be combined with beamforming.

Although lots of carriers like to talk up fancy advancements in mmWave technology, 5G networks will actually be a combination of everything. The various technologies can be thought of in three tiers, which Huawei explains neatly in many of its papers.

Low bands that can be repurposed from radio and TV make up the “coverage layer” at sub 2GHz. This provides wide-area and deep indoor coverage and forms the backbone of the network. There’s the “Super Data Layer” made up of high-frequency spectrum known as mmWave that suits areas requiring extremely high data rates or population coverage. Then the “coverage and capacity layer” sits between 2 and 6 GHz, which offers a good balance between both.

In a nutshell, 5G allows consumers to connect to and leverage the benefits of this wide range of spectrum for faster, and more reliable coverage.

Combination of 5G networking technologies will provide comprehensive coverage.

5G Non-standalone vs standalone

The key to understanding the differences between 5G NSA and SA lies in the network backend. The first 5G networks based on the NSA standard use existing 4G LTE infrastructure to handle the Control Plane. The Control Plane handles the signal traffic, managing how user devices connect to base stations, checking subscriptions, etc. Meanwhile, the data plane is what you and I actually use to send and receive data.

In a sense, 5G NSA can be thought of as just having an extra fast data pipe attached to existing 4G LTE infrastructure. The adoption of the 5G Standalone (SA) specification sees the control plane transition over to the 5G Core and marks much bigger changes for the way that networks operate.

Diagram of differences between 5G NSA and SA

TVS 5G Standalone implements the 5G Core and Control Plane.

In addition to introducing the Control Plane over 5G radio technologies, Standalone supports more flexible Network Slicing and subcarrier encoding.

Network Slicing is a form of virtual networking architecture enabling greater flexibility to partition, share, and link parts of the back-end network together. This will allow network operators to offer more flexible traffic, applications, and services to their customers. This idea is seen as key to realizing ideas such as autonomous vehicles and smart cities.

The changes to subcarriers are a little harder to explain. Technologies encompassed by this include scalable OFDM and sub-carrier spacing, windowed OFDM, flexible numerology, and scalable Transmission Time Intervals. Put simply, frames that carry data can be bigger and faster when higher throughput at high efficiency is required. Alternatively, these frames can be made smaller in order to achieve much lower latency for real-time applications.

The first 5G networks will be based on the non-standalone specification, before bigger changes with the full standalone specification after 2021.

Network slicing can already be done with 4G networks, but 5G aims to improve on the range of flexibility and standardize support. The yet to be finalized 5G Standalone (SA) specification (3GPP Release 16) will divulge more detail on the back-end technologies which will power next-gen networks.

Read Next: Don’t believe the carriers, the 5G revolution is still years away (SA vs NSA)

KT Telecom 5G radio equipment

What does 5G mean for consumers?

More important than the question “what is 5G”, is how it will actually affect consumers. Bottom-line, if you have a need for speed, 5G will help open up new doors.

IMT-2020 5G radio base stations will have to offer at least 20Gbps download and 10Gbps upload speeds to consumers. This refers to a shared link, so actual speeds will be lower. The specification states individual users should see a minimum download speed of 100Mbps and upload speeds of 50Mbps. Some of you might be lucky enough to see these speeds on your LTE-Advanced network already, but this will become a baseline level for all consumers on 5G networks.

Editor’s Pick

5G base stations will have to cover stationary users all the way up to vehicles traveling up to 500km/h (310~ miles), so your data connection hopefully won’t drop out on the train in the future. Fifth generation networks should offer consumers a maximum latency of just 4ms. There’s mention of a 1ms latency for ultra-reliable low latency communications (URLLC) too. For comparison, my 4G LTE connection in London has a questionable 82ms latency, while the U.S. average is around 61 ms.

5G also wants to enable simultaneous connectivity to thousands of low power internet of things (IoT) devices and support device-to-device (D2D) connectivity for low latency connections between nearby devices.

5G vs 4G – key differences

Compared to 4G LTE, 5G networks will be consistently faster. Minimum user rate speeds increase from just 10Mbps to 100Mbps, a 10x increase. Latency is set to fall by a similar amount, from 10ms to just 1ms when compared to LTE-Advanced. The big increase in bandwidth also means that 5G will be able to handle up to one million devices per square kilometer, another 10 fold increase over LTE-A, all with a 10x boost to network energy efficiency.

5G vs 4G LTE speeds

  5G New Radio
(Release 15)
LTE-Advanced Pro
(Release 13 & 14)
LTE-Advanced
(Release 10 to 12)
User Data Rate > 10 Gbps > 3 Gbps > 1 Gbps
Latency > 1ms > 2ms ~10 ms
Frequency Support Up to 40 GHz Up to 6 GHz Up to 6 GHz
Channel Bandwidth Up to 500 MHz Up to 20 MHz Up to 20 MHz
Max carriers 16 (LTE + NR) 32 5
Max Bandwidth 1000 MHz 640 MHz 100 MHz
MIMO antennas 64 to 256 32 8
Spectrum Sharing mmWave & NR
Dual Connectivity
NR-based LAA+
NR MulteFire
LTE-U
LAA / eLAA
LWA
MulteFire
CBRS / LSA
LTE-U
LTE-U (Rel. 12)

As we have covered previously, the range of networking technologies greatly increases too. LTE has undergone many improvements over the years. From the introduction of 256QAM and carrier aggregation with LTE-A to support for wider use of unlicensed spectrum through LAA, LWA, and Multefire with LTE-A Pro. This is why today’s 4G network is much faster than those built during the initial rollout all those years ago.

5G advances another step further, mandating the use of 256QAM and improving carrier aggregation technology to support more flexible carrier bands across unlicensed spectrum, sub-6GHz, and mmWave frequencies. The image below from Arm all the way back in 2016 explains this core difference rather succinctly.

5G networks around the world

The world is gearing up for the launch of 5G, both network operators and device manufacturers. As with the adoption of 4G LTE networks, 5G will be a staged process and some countries will launch their networks well ahead of others.

Mid-2019 is the date to keep an eye on, as both 5G smartphones and networks will be available to the first wave of consumers. However, deployment is not expected to ramp up on a more global scale until 2020 and 2021. Even by 2023, it’s anticipated that just 50 percent of consumers will have a 5G smartphone and network connection.

U.S. 5G rollout

The U.S. will be the first country to flick on its 5G networks across a number of carriers and in a decent selection of cities in the first half of 2019. U.S. carriers have been some of the biggest advocates of millimeter wave technology. Verizon is already the first with consumer 5G via its fixed wireless access service, but Sprint and T-Mobile are close behind with rollouts planned for mid-2019.  We’re actually waiting for 5G smartphones to arrive so that consumers can start using these networks on the go.

However, one of the country’s carriers has already been caught out playing fast and loose with the 5G term. AT&T’s “5G Evolution” is not a 5G network in any sense of the word, it’s simply an evolution of today’s LTE-Advanced networks.

If you want to keep up with all the latest deployment details as each U.S. carrier carries out their 5G rollout, check out the links below.

Europe trails the leaders

Europe is trailing behind the U.S. and the continent’s first 5G networks aren’t expected to switch on until late 2019 at the earliest. Although wider deployments aren’t scheduled until 2020 or later.

The UK is likely to be first with 5G available in major cities. EE is planning to launch its service in 16 cities this year. Meanwhile, O2, Vodafone, and Three still look set for a 2020 5G launch date. On the continent, operators have brought forward some of their plans, but major players Orange, Deutsche Telekom, and Telefonica have only committed to a 2020 launch timeframe.

Part of this delay is that the European telecommunications ministers only unveiled their 5G roadmap for the block at the end of 2017.

Technical harmonization across spectrum bands isn’t scheduled to begin until 2019, with low-frequency 700MHz assignment scheduled for 2020 and availability expected even later in 2022.

Ambitious Asia

Japan and South Korea have been leading infrastructure tests throughout the 5G development cycle and will be right up there with the U.S. when they deploy.

In South Korea, major carriers are expecting commercial 5G deployment in the first half, if not the first quarter of 2019. A nationwide rollout is expected to be complete by 2022. In Japan, the 2020 Olympics are the next target for 5G millimeter wave trials in dense urban areas, and an agreement between Nokia and NTT DoCoMo will see commercial services begin later that year.

China is quickly becoming a major 5G player, tipped to accelerate past its Asian rivals and compete with the U.S. for deployment time. The country is home to major telecom infrastructure companies like Huawei and ZTE, which will provide equipment to carriers around the world. China has also invested $180 billion into mainland infrastructure, four times Japan’s investment. China Mobile is trialing its services in major cities this year and plans a full commercial launch in 2020.

5G signal on Galaxy Note 8

What about 5G smartphones?

There currently aren’t any smartphones built for 5G networks on the market. Unless you count the 5G Moto Mod available for Motorola’s Moto Z3. Still, a number of smartphone manufacturers are talking up 5G smartphone releases for 2019. Most of which will likely appear around the halfway point of the year.

There currently aren’t any smartphone processor chips with integrated 5G modems inside them. Instead, phone manufacturers have to pair up existing processors with external 5G modems, along with the required radio antenna modules. So we shouldn’t expect the first 5G phones to be any more powerful than their 4G LTE rivals. In fact, they may require bigger batteries to cope with the extra 5G power drain.

The first Samsung 5G smartphone is likely to be a dedicated variant of the Galaxy S10. The expected release date is presumed to be Spring 2019. Likewise, Huawei is expected to have its first 5G phone ready for the second half of 2019, but recently that estimate moved to Q1 2019. OnePluswill  launch a 5G phone in 2019. And of course a number of other major manufacturers, including LG, HTC, and Oppo, are all confirmed to be working with Qualcomm’s X50 modem for upcoming phones.

5G frequency bands

Just like with 4G, networks and smartphones will support different frequency bands for data transfer. In addition to the existing LTE bands, 5G New Radio standardizes a number of new ones for upcoming networks. 5G is split into two ranges, the first for frequencies between 400MHz and 6GHz. Range 2 accounts for mmWave bands between 24 and 53GHz.

5G Band Uplink Frequency Downlink Frequency Bandwidth Channel Bandwidths Type
n1 1920 -1989 MHz 2110 – 2170 MHz 60 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n2 1850 – 1910 MHz 1930 – 1990 MHz 60 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n3 1710 – 1785 MHz 1805 – 1880 MHz 75 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 MHz FDD
n5 824 – 849 MHz 869 – 894 MHz 25 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n7 2500 – 2670 MHz 2620 – 2690 MHz 70 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n8 880 – 915 MHz 925 – 960 MHz 35 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n20 832 – 862 MHz 791 – 821 MHz 30 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n28 703 – 748 MHz 758 – 803 MHz 45 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n66 1710 – 1780 MHz 2110 – 2200 MHz 90 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 40 MHz FDD
n70 1695 – 1710 MHz 1995 – 2020 MHz 15/25 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 MHz FDD
n71 663 – 698 MHz 617 – 652 MHz 35 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n74 1427 – 1470 MHz 1475 – 1518 MHz 43 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz FDD
n38 2570 – 2620 MHz 2570 – 2620 MHz 50 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz TDD
n41 2469 – 2690 MHz 2496 – 2690 MHz 194 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 MHz TDD
n50 1431 – 1517 MHz 1432 – 1517 MHz 85 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80 MHz TDD
n51 1427 – 1432 MHz 1427 – 1432 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz TDD
n77 3300 – 4200 MHz 3300 – 4200 MHz 900 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 MHz TDD
n78 3300 – 3800 MHz 3300 – 3800 MHz 500 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 MHz TDD
n79 4400 – 5000 MHz 4400 – 5000 MHz 600 MHz 40, 50, 60, 80, 100 MHz TDD
n75 1432 – 1517 MHz 85 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz SDL
n76 1427 – 1432 MHz 5 MHz 5 MHz SDL
n80 1710 – 1785 MHz 75 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 MHz SUL
n81 880 – 915 MHz 35 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz SUL
n82 832 – 862 MHz 30 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz SUL
n83 703 – 748 MHz 45 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz SUL
n84 1920 – 1980 MHz 60 MHz 5, 10, 15, 20 MHz SUL
n257 26.5 – 29.5 GHz 26.5 – 29.5 GHz 3 GHz 50, 100, 200, 400 MHz TDD
n258 24.250 – 27.5 GHz 24.250 – 27.5 GHz 3.250 GHz 50, 100, 200, 400 MHz TDD
n260 37 – 40 GHz 37 – 40 GHz 3 GHz 50, 100, 200, 400 MHz TDD

Related

Source: Android Zone

The post What is 5G, and what can we expect from it? appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

This week in Android: Honor View 20 and MWC 2019 preview

Our Honor View 20 review is in, and boy does this phone check a lot of boxes. It’s not the first phone we have seen with a punch hole screen and 48 megapixel camera, but it is by far the most gorgeous. The Honor 8 started the 15 layer-glass design, but the Honor View 20 is by far the most beautiful implementation. And the phone itself is no slouch either — check out the full review to learn why.

Plus, we detail a couple of OEMs that will bring 5G phones to MWC. Huawei unveiled its new 5G modem recently, and now it plans to debut the world’s first folding 5G phone at MWC. Plus, LG says it will have a 5G phone with a vapor cooling chamber and possibly some kind of gesture control on board. Add to that a couple of phones with no buttons or ports, and MWC is going to be a busy week.

Finally, as if that wasn’t enough, we have thought pieces about the Google Play Store, dumb smart things, and going all-in on Chromebooks for work.

Here are your top stories for the week

02:00 – Honor View 20 review: A hole-in-one!

The Honor View 20 is hands-down one of the most gorgeous devices we have seen. But is it just a pretty picture?


05:30 – Xiaomi reveals foldable phone prototype: Is this the cheap one we’ve been waiting for?

Prepare yourself for the world’s first double folding phone. That’s not a typo, and has been thoroughly fact checked.


20:40 – Google Play still has a clone problem in 2019 with no end in sight

Google Play has clones and copies aplenty, and there actually isn’t all that much that Google can do about it.


34:15 – Is it dumb that everything is “smart?”

Everything at CES was smart this and smart that, but do we really need everything to be smart?


49:00 – One-month test: Can a Chromebook replace my main computer?

Edgar Cervantes took it upon himself to pack up the Windows and Mac PCs for a month to try exclusively using the Google Pixel Slate. It went better than he expected.


Meanwhile, here are some stories we couldn’t cover on the podcast

Huawei reveals multi-mode 5G modem, confirms 5G phones and foldable phones (or both at the same time) at MWC

Huawei Balong 5000 multi-mode 5G modem.

5G and foldables will be all over MWC this year, and Huawei is joining the party!


LG to launch 5G phone with vapor chamber cooling, big battery, at MWC

LG is launching a 5G phone of its own, with vapor chamber cooling, which is not as righteous as we originally suspected.


Are Android updates getting faster? Let’s look at the data

Have you noticed that your phone is getting updates faster? You’re not alone.


Ugh, Android Q could give carriers more powerful ways to SIM lock phones

Carriers may be able to control your phone in new and exciting ways with these new code commits to Android Q.


LG teases touchless interface for upcoming smartphone

Ugh, touching your phone is soooooo 2018, at least if LG has anything to say about it.


Vivo Apex 2019 has a full-screen fingerprint reader, no ports or buttons

Finally, we have a pair of phones (including this one from Meizu) that think buttons and ports are also a bit 2018 for their taste. Not sure we agree.


Who wants to win an LG V40 ThinQ?

This week, we’re giving away a brand new LG V40 ThinQEnter this week’s Sunday giveaway for your chance to win!

Don’t miss these videos

That’s it, folks! We’ll have another giveaway and more top Android stories for you next week. To stay up to date on all things Android Authority in the meantime, be sure to subscribe to our newsletters at the link below.

Join our newsletters!

Join over 200,000 subscribers for the latest tech reviews, hot deals, and exciting giveaways.
We guarantee 100% privacy. Your information will never be shared. Sign up now and get FREE access to our upcoming exclusive AA Insiders Club:

Source: Android Zone

The post This week in Android: Honor View 20 and MWC 2019 preview appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Android Power Rankings: The best Android brands, ranked

We are now at the start of 2019 after 2018’s bumper year for Android brands. Great flagship devices fighting for overall number one status included the Samsung Galaxy Note 9, the Huawei Mate 20 Pro, and the Google Pixel 3 to name just a few.

At the flagship level, but with just a few less features were the likes of the OnePlus 6 and 6T, both given a serious shake by the new Pocophone F1. And, at the so-bleeding-edge-it-hurts were the likes of the Vivo Nex and the Oppo Find X, with competing innovations in offering full-screen devices. Even as the year came to a close, we saw Honor and Samsung battled it out to be the first smartphone with the punch hole display instead of the notch. A great year, indeed.

But what’s the lay of the land in terms of overall brand success, value, competitiveness, service, style, and importance? Which brand is on top, and which has fallen back?

Introducing Android Power Rankings

The best Android brands, ranked.

What are power rankings?

First, a refresher or introduction to power rankings. Power rankings are, of course, mostly from the world of sports. Systems to rank teams in the NFL, NBA, and NCAA have been around for decades and are part of the fun of a long season. Teams go up and down depending on the strength the team has shown, which mostly comes down to wins and losses. But close losses against top teams can boost a low team, and scrappy, ugly wins for top teams over lower ranked teams might hurt their ranking in close races. It’s a chance to assess the entire league or division, and of course, the fans won’t always agree with whatever system is in place.

How does it work?

How do you power-ranking Android brands, when everything from new devices to an unexpected update with hot new features can change rankings? Is it about proven success, or can a new upstart immediately rank well? Is it about new growth or sustaining a brand without necessarily growing? Is it about having options at every price point, or doing one phone very, very well? Well, it’s all of those.

I’ve decided each ranking subjectively, but took into account metrics such as sales, strength of reviews of devices, our very recent Best of Android results, plus recent poll results around top phones and new brands.

Here’s my Android power rankings for the start of 2019 — one man’s opinion only. I’ll aim to do this at least a few times a year… as long as you promise to argue nice! Let’s get into it.

Android Power Rankings

1. Samsung

Samsung is on top. The King is alive and continue to rule, even as the hyenas and the jackals snap away. While the challengers are coming and may have even had arguably better years across all devices, the Galaxy Note 9 still won phone of the year as best of the best of Android and is the MVP. With One UI rolling out, foldable displays just over the horizon, and new devices with punch hole displays and quad-cameras, Samsung is leading. Oh, and don’t forget the Galaxy S10 coming in less than a month.

Ultimately, here’s why Samsung wins for me. Consider two phones: same size, same specs, same price, but one is branded Samsung, one is Huawei. Which do you go for? Samsung, still, every time.

2. Huawei

Huawei Mate 20

Huawei keeps pulling out the stops in its flagship range and its mid-range value phones. Huawei also has Honor on its side to keep pushing budget flagships, challenger phones, gaming devices, and more. But zero U.S. presence really holds Huawei back, and that pressure may grow during 2019. The Mate 20 Pro was a valiant runner-up behind the Note 9 and showed Huawei has the lead at the moment with the Kirin 980 chipset in terms of performance – just. Huawei is pretty much the only top player showing massive growth – 35 percent in 2018. Will the next Android Power Rankings see it beat Samsung, just like Huawei promised it would do in terms of market share?

3. OnePlus

This is a very high mark for OnePlus, but 2018 was almost a complete success and the brand is massively desirable. The OnePlus 6 started as one of the best phones of the year, and the 6T kept up the momentum. The OnePlus 6T, however, became a divisive release, missing a headphone jack and trading it for a slightly slow in-display fingerprint sensor. The 6T McLaren addition added some premium vibes. Sales were strong, partnerships in the US are growing, but prices keep trending upwards too. The brand is definitely boosted by a strong software release cycle and timely updates. OnePlus 7, a separate 5G device, a TV, and more, await.

4. Xiaomi

The race for third place is close. I debated if Xiaomi is first next-best or second-next best after Samsung and Huawei. Xiaomi’s a massive player in China, India, and growing strongly in Europe. The Mi Mix series offers flagship performance, the Redmi sub-brand (which is still very much Xiaomi) dominates budget devices, while the big brand keeps experimenting with sub-brands and new contenders as well. The Apple of China probably isn’t as true as Xiaomi might like, but the brand is boosted by its jack-of-all-trades offerings as well, with the UK storefront looking surprisingly good. A far bigger presence than OnePlus, but I’d 100% rather have a OnePlus device over a Xiaomi device, for now.

5. Google

Stock Android Skin

The Google Pixel range isn’t yet inside the top four. The Google Pixel range is the benchmark for photography, despite DxOMark’s fumbles in its ranking. But the Google Pixel 3 wasn’t enough to elevate the brand to a proper main player – the phone was expensive, not widely available, and honestly all those leaks made it feel a bit… cheap? Pixel is a great home for Google’s best and brightest software and features, but neither the Pixel 3 or the Pixel 3 XL really stood out other than for the camera and perhaps Google Duplex. Will the rumored Pixel 3 Lite change this?

Still, Google is well ahead of the rest below here and with all those former HTC engineers, is cooking its own hardware for real in 2019.

6. LG

LG UX

LG’s G7 was one of the better flagships this year, although it wasn’t amazing in any one area. The V40 also showed innovation, but LG is fighting an uphill battle for attention against Huawei, Samsung, and others. Never bad, never amazing. Stumbles like announcing an LG G7 One running Android One, and then not announcing pricing for weeks (if not months) might tell us someone, somewhere, jumped the gun. Slow software updates remain a problem. LG is one of the great brands in electronics across all facets of electronics, but in smartphones, can’t figure out how to beat the best. One positive for us, if not LG, is that these devices can often be had for a bargain price just a few months after release. As we asked last week: will life be good in 2019? Let’s hope the rumored foldable phone is a winner.

7. Nokia

Nokia 8.1

Nokia is firmly back. It has continued to produce a steady stream of quality budget wares, with the Nokia 7 Plus and 7.1 being two standouts. The Nokia 8 Sirocco was the first attempt to produce the premium flagship Nokia needs, but it was overpriced and had just as many things to dislike as anyone could like about it. Nokia needs a solid performer that everyone wants if it truly wants to climb up the ranks. Solid performer, very likely selling more than LG, and unlikely to fall from here unless 2019 is a shocker.

8. Oppo

The Oppo Find X was one of the more innovative designs of the year and brought Oppo a big uptick in brand recognition after it proved to be more of a gimmick. The company’s VOOC Super Charge tech was rather slick too. But the company has definitely been overshadowed by its own stablemates in OnePlus, while a competitor like Pocophone came from fierce rival Xiaomi without fighting back directly. Solid, with faint glimpses of spectacular.

9. Sony

Sony Xperia XZ3 in hand (front)

The OLED-screened Sony Xperia XZ3 won numerous IFA awards and showed Sony is still a major player. Before that, the Sony Xperia XZ2 whiffed a bit for being pricey and not having a camera that lived up to the Sony name. Mid-rangers from Sony didn’t always go to plan either – the XA2 series was out of step with the latest trends. But the XZ3 was such a return to form, plus Sony’s solid wider brand and heartland of fans means that it holds onto a top-ten spot. The rumor is Sony might even bring back the headphone jack. Who knew manufacturers really might be listening?

10. HTC

An Image of a hand holding a HTC U12 Plus Flame Red edition.

Poor HTC. Everyone knows HTC isn’t the force it once was. It tried in 2018 but it couldn’t really make a mark. The HTC U12 Plus was and remains a genuine flagship, but had an eye-watering price that did it no favors at all. It also suffered from mistakes like middling battery life, slow software updates, no headphone jack, and couldn’t tick every box its rivals could for features. The return of the headphone jack in the mid-range HTC U12 Life was very welcome. Unfortunately, the device sits in a world where far more competitive alternatives exist, and being a HTC device alone doesn’t trigger an automatic buy. Top ten for now but in 2019 too?

11. Lenovo / Motorola

motorola moto g6 review design cameras

Lenovo keep promising intriguing smartphones but haven’t yet delivered a must-have device. Motorola, bundled in here, seems to be drifting in the wind more than making claims for an almighty comeback. The Moto G6 was a definite budget winner at least. Still trying with Moto Mods, including a 5G mod, for some reason. Here’s hoping the Moto G7 is a winner. As for Lenovo, it’s trying to have the first Snapdragon 855 device in 2019, but what Lenovo says and what Lenovo does aren’t always the same. I am genuinely excited to see this new foldable display Moto RAZR-like device.

12. Vivo

The Vivo Nex was one of the hits of 2018, and a sign of things to come in terms of innovations that enable full-screen displays. I played with the little pop-up camera in person, and came away far more impressed than I thought. The V11 and V11 Pro were decent mid-rangers, while the Vivo X21 had the world’s first in-display fingerprint sensor. The dual-display Vivo Nex 2 offered more leading innovation. But Vivo’s not quite mainstream, and its software is just awful, or at least not designed for a Western audience. A real bleeding-edge brand, but a powerhouse it isn’t. Yet.

13. Pocophone

The Pocophone F1 was really a standout and worthy of the title Rookie of the Year (ROTY) for 2018. It had all the sharpness of Xiaomi manufacturing and supply chain genius, all at a superbly value-packed price. It sold like hot cakes and garnered huge interest for a new device, but crucially wasn’t available globally. A big start to life in 2018, and the F2 with Snapdragon 855 will be hotly anticipated. If you perhaps think this is a rather low position, it’s because of a couple of reasons. Pocophone is very closely tied to Xiaomi, and it’s super new and hasn’t proven itself over longer term. The F1 also didn’t come with important little things like full Widevine DRM for watching HD video, or the requisite cellular bands to fit all places at all times. Still, who can argue at the price, even if your aunt can’t call you in the USA on Verizon? Impressive ROTY, but watch out for a second-season slump.

14. BlackBerry

Blackberry Key2 LE front, keyboard with atomic red frets, showing preloaded apps and BlackBerry features

The Blackberry KeyONE was definitely a smartphone with a keyboard. The Blackberry Key2 was a smartphone with a keyboard that you might even buy, if the shouting YouTubers (you know who they are) didn’t talk you out of it. Then the Key2 LE saw an interesting debut, trying to go low-fi and become more attractive to people who might want a physical keyboard, not spend a lot of money, and even feel like it’s for them. These are deliberately more executive-targeted devices and probably a little too niche to be near the top 10. Backed by solid software which is definitely not always the case below the top eight.

15. Asus

Asus ROG Phone in hand

Between the Zenfone Max Pro M1, Pro M2, and Zenfone 5Z, Asus made value for money a key theme in 2018, with the 5Z a genuine affordable flagship. The former device in particular was a big winner in the Indian market. The ROG phone caught the eye of gamers too and had a wide release which is encouraging. Asus has talked about 2019 being a focusing on mobile gaming, so stay tuned for how that shakes out this year.

16. Razer

The Razer Phone 2 achieved some great improvements over Razer’s first phone but competition is fierce. Encouraging signs for a really established brand in the gaming scene, and at least the 120Hz refresh display gave gamers something genuinely unique for the money, but not anywhere near the bigger guns. This rank feels low, but at the same time, do you own a Razer Phone?

17. Realme

Realme sprung up as Oppo’s solution to the Redmi juggernaut in India. The Realme 1 and Realme 2 and Realme 2 Pro  all came to play in 2018 and immediately gave the budget range something to think about. The reviews didn’t rave about these new devices but Realme did spring into the top three or so in sales in India by late 2018. That’s all it had to do last year. Too low-end for more mainstream consumers, singularly focused on one country for now, but that might change in time. If so, it could be upwards from here.

18. ZTE

Axon M

ZTE ranks near enough to last after the decapitation attempt and late-rescinding from the U.S. government. ZTE will be back and isn’t likely to be down this far in 2019, but for now, one of the bigger players in recent years is resetting and refocusing.

19. Essential

Questionable even in existence, Essential had one good phone in 2017 that’s now a bargain. But it didn’t sell enough, and its camera took more than 12 months to get up to speed. The 2018 cupboard was bare without a new phone and with founder Andy Rubin in hot water. Essential ended up buying an email app, for some reason. What’s next for Essential in 2019? Retirement?

20. Red

The Red Hydrogen One was sort of the anti-Pocophone F1. It generated plenty of interest in its hyped new-fangled display, but then it all collapsed as the Hydrogen One turned out to be lots of outdated bits cobbled together, a trick display with no real purpose, and oh yes, ridiculously expensive to cap it off.

Ranked lower than Essential, because not releasing a phone in 2018 is better than coming to the table with this. Sorry Red. Change our minds this year.


So, how’s the top 20 looking to you? Questions, queries, concerns? Let’s take it to the comments. We’ll be back with updated rankings in a few months time!

Source: Android Zone

The post Android Power Rankings: The best Android brands, ranked appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Get 46 hours of web development & design training for $39

The Complete UI & UX Design Master Class Bundle

Do you have an amazing idea for a killer website or app, like Uber for pets, or something equally unexpected but hopefully much more exciting than our example? Maybe you’re sitting on the next Amazon, and the only thing standing in your way is a lack of the necessary skills to bring your idea to life.

With the Complete UI and UX Design Master Class Bundle, there’s never been a better time to take the plunge into website and app design.

If you’ve ever tried to jump in cold to website design, even using a service that does most of the complicated behind-the-scenes work for you, it can be incredibly daunting and almost comically esoteric.

The Complete UI and UX Master Class Bundle features 46 hours of expert instruction that will teach you everything you need to know about user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) to build an accessible, exciting, and successful app or website from scratch, even if the most programming you’ve ever done is set up a universal remote.

Here’s what you get:

Even if you haven’t come up with an idea for an awesome app just yet, this training bundle will give you the skills and toolset necessary to start a career in web design and development. And right now you can get lifetime access to the whole bundle at 90 percent off for just $39, which is quite frankly a ridiculous markdown from the regular price of $399.92.

Just click the button below to get started.

 

The Complete UI & UX Design Master Class Bundle – $39

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB.

Source: Android Zone

The post Get 46 hours of web development & design training for $39 appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

This short course will show anyone how to code a MySQL database

The Complete MySQL Bootcamp

Just about every single industry on the face of the planet has to deal with a bucket load of data every day. That’s why it’s so important to know how to manage it quickly and efficiently. Learn 21st-century methods with The Complete MySQL Bootcamp, reduced by over 90 percent to just $10.99 for a limited time.

SQL is an open source database coding language — the most popular in the world, in fact — that is used by countless organizations and Fortune 500 companies around the globe.

If you need to learn how it works — and fast — then this crash course is exactly what the doctor ordered.

The Complete MySQL Bootcamp, normally $199.99, will introduce you to the basic fundamentals of MySQL, get you acquainted with the syntax, and it will even show you how to apply your new skills to create a web app and a social networking website.

The course content is delivered 24/7 by experts online so you can learn when it’s convenient. You’ll enjoy lifetime access, which means you won’t ever have to worry about meeting an assignment deadline. Just learn at your leisure and reap the rewards.

Here’s what you get:

  • 24/7 access to 159 lectures and a total of eight hours of beginner-friendly training
  • Become acquainted with SQL and MySQL technology
  • Explore the basic syntax of MySQL
  • The skills necessary to build web applications with PHP
  • Learn how to build the data structure of a social networking website

Successful companies like Amazon, Apple, and Twitter all rely on SQL databases to manage their data. Shouldn’t you too? Learn how for just $10.99 with The Complete MySQL Bootcamp.

 

The Complete MySQL Bootcamp – $10.99

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB. 

Source: Android Zone

The post This short course will show anyone how to code a MySQL database appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Blackberry in 2019: an uphill battle, but one worth fighting

Blackberry isn’t the iconic smartphone brand it once was, now relegated to a niche position.

Over the last couple years it’s dramatically changed the way it does business. Blackberry Limited still owns the brand, but it no longer builds hardware, licensing out its name to partners TCL and India-based Optiemus Infracom.

Today’s Blackberry phones are designed, manufactured, and marketed by those partners. Blackberry Limited merely focuses on creating software and security updates for Blackberry branded devices.

However, despite its smaller role in the mobile world, 2018 was still a great year.

TCL followed the successful 2017 Blackberry KeyOne with the Key2 and Key 2 LE, which gained significant traction for the brand. Meanwhile, newcomer Optiemus Infracom helped the brand expand into India with the Evolve and Evolve X.

The whole year felt like a move in the right direction, but there’s still a long road ahead.

Blackberry in 2018: more devices, more markets

The KeyOne was the beginning of a new direction.

Blackberry’s road to recovery began with the Blackberry KeyOne in 2017. Designed by Blackberry but built by then-new partner TCL, the KeyOne was a breath of fresh air in a market where every phone looked and felt the same. It not only looked dramatically different, thanks to its physical keyboard, but it also felt heftier and more durable than most modern smartphones. Nostalgia also played a role in its success.

Hoping to continue the groundwork laid by the KeyOne, TCL struck again with the announcement of the Blackberry Key2 in June of 2018.

The Blackberry Key2 didn’t reinvent the wheel, focusing more on refinement. It had bigger and better-feeling physical keys, an improved camera, and a much more modern design than its predecessor. Its hardware also performed significantly better than the KeyOne thanks to an upgraded Snapdragon 660 and double the RAM at 6GB.

As Jimmy Westenberg noted in our review, the only real downside was the price.

Blackberry Key2

At $650, the Blackberry Key2 was one of the most expensive mid-range phones around — $100 more expensive than its predecessor. While companies like OnePlus offered the latest Qualcomm processors for noticeably less money, TCL asked quite a premium for relatively modest specs.

In fairness, the price wasn’t so shocking. Adding a physical keyboard wasn’t cheap, especially since other OEMs didn’t use them. Production yields were smaller, and development costs were higher. The inclusion of a convenience key also didn’t help keep the cost down.

The Key2 took everything we loved from the KeyOne but improved on what we didn’t.

Anyone who has ever used a Key2 will probably agree it’s just “another ordinary smartphone” without both of these things, so there’s probably not a whole lot TCL could have down to keep pricing lower on the Key2. However, regardless of reason, the Key2’s price was a roadblock for some buyers.

Hoping to appeal to those with reservations, TCL introduced the Blackberry Key2 LE in August.

Blackberry Key2 LE front, keyboard with atomic red frets, showing preloaded apps and BlackBerry features

Sporting a keyboard and similar looks to the Key2, the LE downgraded horsepower, battery life, and camera quality in order to bring the cost down to a much more reasonable $399. Performance wise, the Key2 LE slotted between the retired KeyOne and the flagship Key2.

The LE was a home run for TCL. At CES 2019 TCL confirmed the Key2 family had significantly outsold the KeyOne, and the Blackberry Key2 LE played a large part in this.

TCL acknowledged the Key2 sold at least on the same level with the KeyOne, but the LE’s lower price made it a more compelling option for enterprise buyers and general consumers. Blackberry also admitted that the phone’s more colorful design helped the device better appeal towards women and younger audiences.

The TCL-made Key2 family was Blackberry’s only global offering, but new partner Optiemus Infracom also produced two phones of its own using the Blackberry brand name. Available exclusively in India, the Evolve and Evolve X arrived in the latter half of 2018.

Unlike TCL’s models, the Evolve family ditched the physical keyboard and launched with relatively low end specs. Though not as expensive as the Key2, these devices weren’t particularly low cost at 24,990 rupees (~$364) for the Evolve and 34,990 rupees (~$509) for the Evolve X.

Blackberry in 2018: the slow road to rebuilding a legacy

We don’t have hard data on Blackberry sales for 2018, as Blackberry and its partners haven’t been exactly forthcoming. Still, it’s safe to say sales were probably a fraction of bigger brands like Huawei and Samsung.

Regardless, TCL is very pleased with how its Blackberry phones have fared. The company knew it would be an uphill battle when it signed on.

In 2017 Blackberry had mostly faded out of the public eye. Phones with physical keyboards were all but dead, and most manufacturers believed there was no longer a market for it.

Selling a phone with an arguably obsolete keyboard and an identity crisis was never going to be easy but somehow Blackberry has slowly turned things around.

To make matters worse, TCL’s own consumer surveys indicated consumers were deeply confused about Blackberry’s identity. Only 20 percent even realized Blackberry phones now run on Android. The problem was Blackberry phones were strongly associated with the aging Blackberry OS, which was known for its lack of apps.

Selling a phone with an arguably obsolete keyboard and an identity crisis was never going to be easy. Yet a year later, TCL’s 2018 consumer surveys indicated now more than 80 percent of consumers knew that Blackberry no longer used BBOS.

In a little over two years, TCL managed to slowly win over a small fanbase in consumer and enterprise segments. It also overcame some of the brand confusion in the process, thanks to marketing and the passage of time. This isn’t Apple-levels of success, but it’s a great start.

What’s next for Blackberry as a smartphone brand?

All three Blackberry Key2 LE color models showing backs, real dual-cameras, and buttons

Blackberry probably won’t ever get back to its former rockstar status, but there’s still reason to be optimistic.

Later this year we can almost certainly expect TCL to unveil the Key2’s successor. There aren’t any real rumors about the phone, but it’s pretty likely we’ll see continued refinement, rather than major evolution. The real ace up TCL’s sleeve won’t be hardware or software features, but timing.

When the Key2 first came out it was fighting against the fact most users who wanted a physical keyboard already had the Blackberry KeyOne. Considering many U.S. consumers still buy new phones roughly every two years, the Key3 (or whatever it is called) could be a tempting proposition, especially if Blackberry can get its phones into more carrier stores. There’s good news on that front as well.

At CES 2019 TCL unveiled plans to release the Blackberry Key 2 LE as an option for Verizon enterprise customers. Previously Blackberry’s enterprise efforts were mostly through direct sales relationships, so having a major U.S. carrier on board is a huge deal. While this isn’t as exciting as a full on partnership with Verizon for “normal” consumers, it’s a step forward and could lead to better carrier relationships in 2019 and beyond.

More challenges to come, or just the same ones all over again?

iPhone XS Max in man's hand against a white backdrop.

Apple and Samsung will continue to be Blackberry’s biggest challengers in the enterprise market.

Blackberry may have mostly overcome its OS identity problem, but many of its original problems will continue to haunt it in 2019 and for years to come.

The majority of consumers and enterprise users will continue to wonder if a physical keyboard is just a waste of space. This problem will only get worse as phone displays get bigger, better, and even foldable.

With so many “new” trends around the bend, Blackberry will need to work hard to show consumers why a keyboard is a good idea even in today’s screen-centric world.

Related: Everything we know about Samsung’s foldable phone

Despite a history of enterprise success, even here Blackberry won’t have an easy time.

While TCL is billing itself as a third option to Samsung and Apple, these are established brands with consumer and business trust. People are just learning to trust and understand Blackberry again.

To its credit, Blackberry is the only brand with both software and hardware recommended by the Google Enterprise Recommended program. Google’s approval could be enough to earn some positive attention. The lower pricing on LE models could also be much more attractive to enterprise buyers than Apple’s considerably more expensive products. Of course, Samsung offers phones in multiple price points, which arguably makes this a moot point.

Blackberry needs to be bold with its marketing in 2019

It’s too early to say if Optiemus Infracom has a bright future in Blackberry, but we’re pretty confident TCL is on to something.

Although TCL’s Blackberry has a role to play in the consumer market, we truly believe the enterprise market is its best shot at real success in the future. Getting more aggressive with pricing will help, but TCL really needs to up its marketing efforts.

The key is to push the message that its phones are better business devices because they put productivity front and center with its keyboards. A smaller screen also makes them less convenient for entertainment — movies, games, and so on — which could appeal to businesses that want a no-nonsense device its employees won’t use for the wrong reasons.

TCL and Optiemus Infracom still have a lot of work to do in 2019 if they want to win over more consumers, but the future certainly looks brighter than it did just a few years prior.

Source: Android Zone

The post Blackberry in 2019: an uphill battle, but one worth fighting appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.