How to Fix the 413 Request Entity Too large Error in WordPress

Are you seeing the 413 Request entity too large error in WordPress? This error usually occurs when you are trying to upload a theme or plugin file in WordPress. In this article, we will show you how to easily fix the 413: request entity too large error in WordPress.

WordPress 413 error - Request entity too large

What Causes WordPress 413 Request Entity Too Large Error?

This error usually happens when you are trying to upload a file that exceeds the maximum file upload limit on your WordPress site.

Your web server will fail to upload the file, and you will see the 413 request entity too large error page.

413 request entity too large error example

Normally, most WordPress hosting companies have their servers configured, so that WordPress users can easily upload large images and other media.

However, sometimes this setting is not high enough to upload large theme or plugin files.

It would also stop you from uploading large files in media library. In that case, you will see a different message, clearly stating that the file size exceeds maximum allowed limit.

File size exceeds maximum upload size limit

That being said, let’s take a look at how to fix the the WordPress 413 request entity too large error.

Fixing 413 Request Entity Too Large Error in WordPress

There are multiple ways to fix the request entity too large error in WordPress. We will cover all these methods, and you can try the one that works best for you.

Method 1. Increase Upload File Size Limit via Functions File

Simply add the following code to your theme’s functions.php file or a site-specific plugin.

@ini_set( 'upload_max_size' , '64M' );
@ini_set( 'post_max_size', '64M');
@ini_set( 'max_execution_time', '300' );

You can increase the values in upload_max_size and post_max_size to be more than the file you are trying to upload. You will also need to increase the max_execution_time to the time you think it would take for the file to upload. If you are unsure, then you can try doubling this value.

Method 2. Increase Upload File Size Limit via .htacces File

For this method, you will need to edit the .htaccess file and add the following code at the bottom:

php_value upload_max_filesize 64M
php_value post_max_size 64M
php_value max_execution_time 300
php_value max_input_time 300

To learn more about increasing file upload size limit, see our guide on how to increase the maximum file upload size in WordPress.

Method 3. Manually Upload File via FTP

If the 413 error only occurs when you are uploading one particular file, then you may want to consider uploading the file manually via FTP.

If you are trying to upload a WordPress theme, then see our guide on how to install a WordPress theme and jump to the ‘Installing a WordPress theme using FTP’ section.

If you are trying to upload a plugin, then see our guide how to install a WordPress plugin and jump to ‘Manually install a WordPress plugin using FTP’ section.

For other files, see our guide on how to manually upload WordPress files using FTP.

We hope this article helped you learn how to fix the WordPress 413 request entity too large error. You may also want to see our list of the most common WordPress errors and how to fix them.

If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for WordPress video tutorials. You can also find us on Twitter and Facebook.

The post How to Fix the 413 Request Entity Too large Error in WordPress appeared first on WPBeginner.

Source: Wordpres

The post How to Fix the 413 Request Entity Too large Error in WordPress appeared first on trickmost.ml.

How i am chance to Art, science, and some silly assumptions

Do we expect to understand art and the natural sciences in the same way? Today, here’s a cartoon to open a comparison in class discussion, with questions and a download at the end. I hope it gives you not only material for class but also a smile.

“How am I supposed to appreciate it?”

cartoon by Theo Dombrowski

Using the cartoon in class

This cartoon, drawn for Theory of Knowledge by my husband Theo, is clearly intended to give a humorous kick in its conclusion by setting up false expectations in the reader and then, in its final frame, turning the tables. It does this by mimicking and echoing many of the most common contemptuous comments made about so-called “modern art” – yet rarely made about other areas of knowledge.

At the same time, though, attitudes recently expressed towards science in some countries may, sadly, make this contrast less obvious. Contempt for facts – even for the findings of illustrious scientific groups – has contaminated public discourse and often decision-making.

It would be sad indeed if our students endorsed the attitudes expressed by the characters in this cartoon. They are the ones to be treated with laughter, not the science or the art that they dismiss – even though I suspect their comments find an echo in many of us!

How could this cartoon be used in class? The questions that follow it could open a discussion directed toward a succession of related topics. Use them as they are, or use them to prompt your own ideas. You might choose one or two, to ask lightly and reinforce points already made in class, so that you give only a few class minutes in passing to the cartoon. You might, though, want to print them out for students to consider in small group discussions, so that the cartoon and questions fuel a lesson.

To give you maximum flexibility, I’ve prepared the cartoon and questions as a download at the end of this post.

“How am I supposed to appreciate it?” : Theory of Knowledge Questions for Discussion

1. The angry speaker in this cartoon is unlikely to represent attitudes that any of us in a Theory of Knowledge class hold personally. Nevertheless, can you recognize in yourself even a minor inclination to make some of the same judgments as shown in the cartoon – towards some famous works of art, or towards any other areas of knowledge? Do you yourself respect and often admire achievements in different areas of knowledge, even if you don’t personally understand them?

2. Is there a difference in your expectations of the sciences and the arts in this regard? Do you assume that you should be able to understand both – or maybe neither? What does “understanding” involve for gravitational waves – that is, for those of us who are not physicists? What does “understanding” involve for abstract art – that is, for those of us who are not artists or art critics?

3. Before we can evaluate whether a new development in an area of knowledge is an exciting contribution – or even worthwhile – how much background knowledge do you think we need to have? Is a judgment with no background knowledge just as good as one with a lot of background knowledge? Which would you expect to be more accessible to you without much study: an artwork (whether a painting, a novel, or a musical composition) or a scientific discovery? Which are you more inclined to judge for whether it’s worthwhile?

4. What makes a scientific discovery or scientific explanation be accepted as valuable in its area of knowledge? Who judges? What is meant by the “scientific community”? What are their criteria for evaluation and judgment? What is meant by “scientific consensus”? What is meant by an “expert”?

5. What makes a work of art – a painting, dance performance, novel, film, musical composition, for instance – be accepted as valuable in its area of knowledge? Who judges? What are the criteria for evaluation and judgment, and are they communally shared? To what extent does an audience in the arts expect consensus? What is meant by an “expert”?

Note for further reflection: The cartoon is based on four of the most innovative, iconic – and mocked – twentieth century artists. You might want to check out some of the works of Pablo Picasso, Henry Moore, Andy Warhol, and Jackson Pollock and consider why, in defying the norms of “traditional art”, they have been so susceptible to mockery. What about their work could have made them seem beyond the fringe for even those who felt they possessed considerable knowledge of art and artistic standards?

6. Based on your responses to #4 and #5 above, in what ways is evaluation of work in the arts and in the sciences similar? In what ways is it different?

7. But so what? Are developments in either field any use in our lives? Do we expect that knowledge should be useful above all? What do you think are the best things that the sciences and the arts contribute to our lives?

The post How i am chance to Art, science, and some silly assumptions appeared first on trickmost.ml.

Four new Huawei phones with dual cameras spotted on TENAA

Four new Huawei phones have been spotted on TENAA.
All of them seem to sport full frame displays, dual rear cameras, and rear mounted fingerprint sensors.
Of the 4 models listed, only one of them sports the Honor brand.

New Huawei smartphones have been spotted on the Chinese telecommunications certification site, TENAA, indicating an impending launch. The Huawei phones go by the model numbers FLA-TL10, FLA-AL00, LDN-TL00, and the LND-TL30. While not much information is evident going by the model numbers, the LND-TL30 sports an Honor branding indicating this could be the Honor 7C.

The TENAA listing shows pictures of the front and back of the devices. All phones seem to feature full-frame 18:9 displays, dual rear-cameras and rear mounted fingerprint sensors. The FLA-TL10, FLA-AL00, and the LDN-TL00 sport the Huawei branding on the front. The FLA series seem to feature dual front cameras and the overall design is reminiscent of the Nova series phones such as the Nova 2S. The LDN-TL00 is shown in a blue polycarbonate body but has only a single-lens selfie shooter.
The LND-TL30 is purported to be the Honor 7C. It features dual front and rear cameras and the body appears to be made of metal with upper and lower plastic inserts. The Honor 7C looks to be a minor variant of the Honor 7X and is likely to sport a similar spec sheet.
Read: Best Huawei phones
Apart from the model numbers and pictures of the phones, nothing much is known about the handsets themselves. We will know more details when the devices pass certification, but it looks like Huawei could be creating competition within its own product range as there’s not much differentiation between the phones at this point. But the strategy does appear to pay off, especially with Chinese OEMs, and that could be the reason for their continued success in price-sensitive Asian markets.
Source: Trickmost.ml

The post Four new Huawei phones with dual cameras spotted on TENAA appeared first on trickmost.ml.

Google made it easier to book hotels and flights through search results

Google

In addition to flights, you can now book hotels through Google Search.
You can filter flight and hotel search results by price, date, and more.
The new features and layout are now rolling out.

Google announced today it has changed the way its hotel and flight search works in an effort to make trip planning simpler on mobile devices.
The update introduces a new layout with four tabs: Explore, Flights, Hotels, and Your Trips. The Explore tab provides additional information on your destination, while Your Trips presents a list of past and future trips.
Results in Your Trips are private, so only you can see that information. You can email your trip reservations to others from the tab and make edits to your reservations, even if you are offline.
As before, the Flights tab lets you book flights and filter them by date and price. The Hotels tab lets you book hotels and break things down by price, date, occupancy, and other factors. Hotels also displays photos and lets you swipe between them without leaving the list of results.
Editor’s PickGoogle+ Android app getting “brand new version” in coming days

A “brand new version” of the Google+ Android app will be here in the next few days, according to Google+ engineering manager Leo Deegan. Deegan discussed the new version in a post yesterday (via Android …
Hotels will automatically be populated once you book a flight, with Flights also populated if you book a hotel first.
Even if you have not booked a hotel or flight, both sections are accessible when you search destinations in Google Flights. This is part of Google’s broader discovery feature that suggests destinations and getaway trips you might be interested in.
The overarching goal might be to cater to those who plan and book trips on their smartphones. Not as many people make travel plans on their computers as they did in years past, so it makes sense to enrich the mobile experience.
Source: Trickmost.ml

The post Google made it easier to book hotels and flights through search results appeared first on trickmost.ml.