Automate email marketing campaigns with Stackmails — now just $49

Stackmails

Got a dump truck load of client emails to answer? Get to each and every one of them — in less time than it’ll take you to read this — with a Lifetime Subscription to the Stackmails Email Automation Unlimited Plan, on sale right now for just $49.

If you run email marketing campaigns, then a subscription to Stackmails is a must-have tool. That’s because it streamlines the entire process of sending and receiving mass amounts of emails so you can spend more of your valuable time on other things.

Easily create custom email campaigns with tools for automation, analytics, personalization, and more.

Stackmails connects to your existing Gmail account and makes it easy to start a new campaign. Just create your own personalized email and send it out to as many as 2,000 recipients at once.

You can program Stackmails to search for triggers in your responses and it will send out customized replies to those emails automatically. It’s the no fuss, no muss solution that keeps your client base informed and gives you the gift of extra time.

Here’s what you get:

  • Ability to create and automate personalized email follow-ups and drip campaigns
  • Bring leads and prospects from your website or store with MySQL integration
  • Send personalized emails to up to 2,000 recipients
  • Integrate multiple Gmail accounts
  • Easily monitor your links, bounce rates, and more

A lifetime subscription to Stackmails is normally $2,280. If you purchase right now through this special limited time offer, however, you’ll save thousands and get it for just $49.

 

Stackmails Email Automation Unlimited Plan: Lifetime Subscription – $49

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB

Source: Android Zone

The post Automate email marketing campaigns with Stackmails — now just $49 appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

We asked, you told us: Most of you are running Android Pie

samsung galaxy s9 one ui review android pie logo easter egg

It should come as no surprise that Android updates are fragmented. With smartphone manufacturers taking months to build skins around new firmware and implement new features, a whole new version of Android could be released before some handsets ever get upgraded.

The last time Google published new distribution numbers in late October, Android Pie wasn’t even on the list. This meant that almost half a year after the firmware was made public, less than o.1 percent of all Android handsets had seen the latest version of Android.

So as Google hasn’t given us any official number in several months, we decided to ask you what version of Android you’re running. Here is what you had to say.

What version of Android are you running?

!function(e,t,s,i){var n=”InfogramEmbeds”,o=e.getElementsByTagName(“script”)[0],d=/^http:/.test(e.location)?”http:”:”https:”;if(/^/{2}/.test(i)&&(i=d+i),window[n]&&window[n].initialized)window[n].process&&window[n].process();else if(!e.getElementById(s)){var r=e.createElement(“script”);r.async=1,r.id=s,r.src=i,o.parentNode.insertBefore(r,o)}}(document,0,”infogram-async”,”https://e.infogram.com/js/dist/embed-loader-min.js”);

Results

Now before you go running to the comment section to shout that these number can’t be real, let’s take a step back and examine the data. Understand that these are the results of a small subsection of the Android community. As you might expect, most of the people who read Android Authority and took the time to vote in this week’s poll are Android enthusiasts and are more likely to own smartphones that have been updated more recently.

With this in mind, it’s understandable that just over 50 percent of the nearly 10,000 voters are running Android 9 Pie.

The last time the Android distribution numbers were updated, Oreo, Nougat, and Marshmallow were roughly in a three-way tie. Taking into consideration that, again, most of the voters are using newer smartphones, Android Oreo came in second with 37 percent of the votes.

It’s not very surprising that only 12 percent of the rest of the voters were running a version of Android that was more than two years old.

Noteworthy comments

Here are some of the best comments from last week’s poll explaining why they voted the way that they did:

  • I’m have a Samsung galaxy note 8 so i guess i Will have oreo for a loooong time 😁
  • My Chromebook is on Nougat… does that count?
  • I have the choice between nougat, oreo and pie but using nougat
  • I don’t really surprised if android pie leading. Not because the fragmentation of the android has ended. But because all the voters are geeks or android enthusiast. So I’m sure most people outside of this site readers are using android oreo or lower. 😂😂
  • Why did Google stop reporting the numbers? Is it just embarrassing now…

That’s it for this week, everyone. As always, thanks for voting, thanks for the comments, and don’t forget to let us know what you thought of the results below.

Source: Android Zone

The post We asked, you told us: Most of you are running Android Pie appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Android Q teardown hints at native screen recording, an emergency shortcut, more

Nokia 7.1 installing Android 9.0 Pie update

By the time Google gets around to releasing the Android Q Developer Preview, there likely won’t be many surprises. Thanks to a teardown of Android Q’s System UI by 9to5Google, we have a better idea of what new features the search giant might add to its mobile operating system later this year.

For some years now, Android has had a built-in screen recording feature, but it had to be initiated using an ADB command from a computer. Looking at several code strings, Android Q might introduce a system-level screen recording option similar to what’s available on iOS and offered by using third-party apps.

As it is implemented right now, the first time that the feature is used, Android will request access to the necessary permissions for recording the screen and saving video files. While in use, there will be an ongoing notification, controls to start, end, and share the recording, and an option to record an accompanying voiceover.

9to5Google also confirmed XDA-Developer’s report that Android Q will likely bring support for secure facial recognition. Users will probably use with the same “biometric_dialog” that Android Pie introduced for interacting with the fingerprint sensor to authenticate and authorize payments.

In Android Pie, Google added a screenshot button to the power menu. It appears that Android Q might add an emergency shortcut to the menu that will take users to the emergency dialer.

Android Q Teardown Emergency Shortcut 9to5Google

Some additions seem to be focused on privacy. The first of which includes a “Sensor Privacy” quick setting that will disable some of the phone’s sensors. It’s not known yet what this will be used for, but the option isn’t shown by default.

Android Q is likely also going to highlight when one or more apps are using the device’s location and microphone. This is another feature that has been implemented in iOS for a number of years now. Instead of being in the dark on what’s happening in the background, you’ll be fully aware of what apps are doing with options available for you to stop them.

Editor’s Pick

Lastly, Android Q looks to be preparing for 5G and WPA3. While we’ve already seen AT&T update some of its phones to display “5GE” icons, the new firmware officially includes 5G and 5G+ icons within the operating system. And over a year after WPA3 was announced, Android Q should bring support for the new Wi-Fi standard.

Oh, and in case you were wondering, the System UI demo mode hints that Android Q will be version 10.

What other features do you want Google to bring to Android Q? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below.

Source: Android Zone

The post Android Q teardown hints at native screen recording, an emergency shortcut, more appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

How much does the RAM and storage in your phone actually cost?

An image showing the front and back of the new Samsung LPDDR5 DRAM chip. Samsung

I’m sure my eyes weren’t the only ones watering at the leaked price for Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy S10.

The report suggests that the most expensive S10 Plus model, which packs 12GB RAM and 1TB of internal storage will cost 1,599 euros (~$1,818). It wasn’t long ago that smartphones controversially passed the $1000 mark and it appears that we could soon be at the $2,000 milestone. Ouch!

Editor’s Pick

The only extra you get when you opt for the top variant is more RAM and more storage. As far as we know, nothing else about the smartphone’s specs change. However, the premium paid for this extra memory appears to rise exponentially.

Here’s a breakdown of the European leaked prices, converted to U.S. dollars:

  • Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 6GB RAM/128GB storage: $1,193
  • Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 8GB RAM/512GB storage: $1,477
  • Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus 12GB RAM/1TB storage: $1,818

(In the United States, Galaxy S10 Plus prices are likely to be lower, but still nowhere near affordable.)

The difference between the 6GB/128GB Galaxy S10 Plus and the 8GB/512GB model is $284. In other words, you’ll pay $284 for the extra 2GB of RAM and 384GB of storage space.

That’s already expensive, but the move from 8GB/512GB to 12GB/1TB could cost a further $341. In this case, $341 gets you 4GB of RAM and 512GB of storage space.

Memory isn’t usually the most expensive component in a smartphone, that’s usually the display and application processor. Although, to be fair to Samsung, cutting-edge memory in a very high capacity can often cost a premium. But is there some level of price gouging going on here?

How much does memory really cost?

Pinning down exactly how much RAM and NAND flash memory costs is a tricky business, in no small part because component prices are almost impossible to find. There are various capacities, technologies, and manufacturers to pick from, each charging slightly different prices. Not to mention that Samsung and other OEMs have much better bargaining power to negotiate prices below anything you’ll find online.

We attempted to track down equivalent part prices from component retailers, including Mouser and DigiKey, but there’s a considerable markup applied on these sites that Samsung definitely isn’t paying.

We’re going to have to use a bit of intuition to figure this out.

According to this bill of materials (BOM) breakdown, the Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus‘ 6GB RAM cost Samsung just $39, probably because it was sourced in-house (Samsung is a leading RAM and flash storage manufacturer). Meanwhile, 64GB of UFS flash memory from Toshiba cost just $12.

Flash storage

We can extrapolate Samsung’s Galaxy S9 costs up to 512GB and 1TB of storage. Ignoring falling flash memory prices and savings by scaling up capacity, prices could be in the region of $96 for 512GB and $192 for 1TB. Actual costs are likely to be lower if we factored in the cost savings of scale. Industry estimates suggest that flash storage could cost just $0.08 per GB in 2019, which could halve our conservative estimates here.

RAM 

As for RAM, we can make a similar assumption. The move from 6 to 8GB should cost no more than 33 percent more. This suggests that an 8GB LPDDR4 chip should cost somewhere in the region of $52 for Samsung. Meanwhile, the 12GB chip should cost somewhere around $78.

Remember though, this is a very rough estimate based on extrapolating guideline prices. This gives us a very conservative ballpark, but actual prices that Samsung pays could be lower. And DRAM prices across the market are currently dropping due to oversupply and sluggish demand.

So what’s the markup?

Using these ballpark estimates will get us in the region of Samsung’s BOM.

  • The RAM and storage in the base 6GB/128GB Galaxy S10 Plus should cost around $63.
  • The RAM and storage in the 8GB/512GB model should cost around $148. That’s $85 more compared to the lower version.
  • The RAM and storage in the 12GB/1TB model should cost around $270. That’s $122 more compared to the lower version.

We calculate the estimated cost differences between models at $85 and $122 respectively. Certainly not the $284 and $341 price hikes that Samsung is rumored to be charging for the Galaxy S10 Plus models with more storage. We’re looking at a markup of around 179% to 234% on these parts, which could be potentially much higher if flash memory prices fall as far as expected.

Galaxy S10 Plus variant Estimated cost of memory Cost increase over lower tier Price premium over lower tier Markup
6GB RAM/128GB storage $63 N/A N/A N/A
8GB RAM/512GB storage $148 $85 $284 234%
12GB RAM/1TB storage $270 $122 $341 179.5%

Bear in mind, these rough calculations don’t take into account the full picture. There are other development costs, such as configuring drivers and other bits of software involved too. Even so, there’s definitely a significant markup applied by smartphone manufacturers for the privilege of owning larger storage capacities.

We’ll keep an eye out for a Galaxy S10 BOM after the phone launches on February 20. That will tell us how accurate our estimation was and how much of the price premium is just profit in Samsung’s pockets.

Why?

To be clear, we’re not singling out Samsung here. Higher markups for top-tier versions seem to be the norm, and not just in the mobile industry. From a consumer’s perspective, it seems greedy. But if you put yourself in a mobile CEO’s shoes, you may be less inclined to think so.

The high premium that customers pay for the higher-end versions of a phone may help “subsidize” the base models, which have lower profit margins. Furthermore, memory and storage is one of the few opportunities to upsell for a phone manufacturer. In an extremely competitive market, offering highly expensive, high-powered variants means companies can improve their margins without completely giving up on more budget-conscious buyers.

Let us know your thoughts!

Source: Android Zone

The post How much does the RAM and storage in your phone actually cost? appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Enjoy a lifetime of auto Instagram management for just $39.99

Appz Instagram Assistant

Social media apps like Instagram might be the best way to spread your personal brand. The problem? It’s so damned time-consuming.

You could literally spend your entire day looking for other creators to follow, liking content that appeals to you, and managing interactions. You’d have no time for anything else. How is that productive?

That’s what makes a lifetime subscription to the Appz Instagram Assistant, discounted by 96 percent to just $39.99 to manage one account, such a worthwhile purchase.

This browser extension easily connects to your IG account and runs it for you. It finds other content producers to follow, likes content that suits your preferences, and even makes comments on your behalf.

It’s fully customizable, too, so you can make Appz behave exactly as you would as if you were online 24/7 — except you’re actually not. It’ll be our little secret.

Here’s what you get:

  • Allows for easy automation of your Instagram growth
  • Get access to engagement reports
  • Focus Appz to a predetermined area
  • Ability to configure it to your personal preference
  • Manage multiple Instagram accounts in one dashboard

Instagram is fun… to a point. After that, it’s simply another hassle that controls our lives. Take command with a lifetime subscription to the Appz Instagram Assistant and pay just $39.99 — a savings of 96 percent off the regular price of $1,080.

 

Appz Instagram Assistant: Lifetime Subscription – $39.99

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB

Source: Android Zone

The post Enjoy a lifetime of auto Instagram management for just $39.99 appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

iPhone XS Max, Mate 20 Pro represent two fates for the luxury flagship

Galaxy Note 9

It feels like just the other day when the $299 OnePlus One and $180 Moto G redefined value in the smartphone space. Back then, $500 to $600 flagships were the norm, and $150 to $200 phones were disappointing experiences for the most part.

Last year played host to a similar year in terms of bang for your buck, with low-cost flagships grabbing headlines throughout. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 blew away expectations, offering a top-end Snapdragon 845 chipset for just $300. Who cares if the cameras aren’t amazing when it has a speedy chipset, loads of memory, and plenty of storage, right?

Huawei’s Honor sub-brand joined Xiaomi in redefining expectations too, launching the ~$300 Honor Play and ~$450 Honor 10 — both powerful, feature-rich devices at low price tags.

Read: Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 review — What’s old is new again

That wasn’t the only really big trend of the last year. There was also the continued rise of the ultra-expensive, luxury flagship phone like the iPhone XS Max, LG V40 ThinQSamsung Galaxy Note 9 and Huawei Mate 20 Pro.

Coming in at around $1,000, these phones are clearly positioned at the top of the pile for price, but they aren’t gold-plated like those silly Vertu phones. There’s more to today’s ultra-premium phones than garish aesthetics.

What do luxury flagships offer?

“Why should I grab a $1,000 phone when $300 devices are better than they’ve ever been?” I hear you muse.

That $300 Pocophone F1 will certainly do the job well, but it makes several compromises to reach that price. The luxury flagships excel at being compromise-free experiences for the power user.

Buy the Pocophone F1 over the Galaxy Note 9 and you miss out on an industry-leading OLED screen, Bluetooth-powered stylus, up to 512GB of expandable storage, and the trifecta of wireless chargingIP68, and a headphone jack. You also get an excellent rear-facing dual-camera setup, which earned Samsung a nod in our Best of Android 2018 awards.

You’re missing out on a ton of features if you opt for an affordable flagship over a $1000 phone.

Get the Pocophone F1 over the Mate 20 Pro, and you’re missing out on water resistance, wireless charging, reverse wireless charging, an OLED display, and 3D face unlock. You’re also missing out on a slick triple camera setup featuring wide, telephoto, and normal lenses.

The LG V40 ThinQ was similarly stacked for close to $1,000, sporting an IP68 design, OLED screen, quad-DAC audio hardware, a headphone jack, wireless charging, and an innovative triple camera setup on the back of the device. The V40 was the best sounding smartphone of 2018, as we learned in our Best of Android 2018 awards.

These features might not make a big difference for the average user, but power users will certainly like the “everything but the kitchen sink” approach. Heck, even the average consumer has to admit you get quite a few extras compared to affordable flagships.

LG V40 ThinQ camera closeup

In the other corner, Pocophone F1 and Honor devices aren’t the only affordable high-end phones that don’t quite match up to luxury flagships. The $530 OnePlus 6 and $550 OnePlus 6T also make several compromises compared to top devices, skipping a proper IP rating, wireless charging, and OIS on the secondary camera. Again, something has to give to achieve the lower price point.

Are luxury flagships here to stay?

Big Android OEMs are definitely not afraid to put out luxury flagships, but Apple practically owns the space thanks to its iPhone XS series. Starting at $999 for the iPhone XS and $1,099 for the Max model, you get a beast of a chipset, IP68 water and dust resistance, wireless charging, a 12MP standard and 12MP telephoto rear camera pairing (both with OIS), and 3D face unlock.

In fact, you could argue Apple’s move towards luxury is what prompted Android OEMs to go upscale in the first place.

The front of the Apple iPhone XS Max.

Apple’s move to go higher made plenty of sense in the beginning, allowing it to earn a bigger profit margin at the expense of market share. But the strategy appears to have backfired in a massive way, as iPhone sales are now flagging. The Cupertino firm revealed that it expects lower Q1 revenue due to the reduced demand for iPhones. The company also blamed battery replacements and the Chinese market for the drop in sales.

Samsung has been feeling the sting with the Galaxy Note 9 too, issuing alarming Q4 2018 guidance. The Korean company expects profits to fall 28 percent compared to a year ago, marking the first decline of the sort for the firm in over two years. The company largely attributes the drop to its memory chip business, but it also confirmed that smartphone sales were flat. In other words, the Galaxy Note 9 wasn’t the sales winner they thought it could be. It’s no accident that Samsung is drumming up excitement for foldables as an antidote to current “modest smartphone sales.”

Editor’s Pick

LG is expecting a massive 80 percent drop in profits compared to a year ago, with analysts citing smaller profit margins for TVs and (yes) lower smartphone sales for the drop. Presumably, the LG V40 didn’t quite rake in big numbers for the company.

Looking at Apple and Samsung, one could certainly argue their luxury flagships didn’t do enough to stand out from the already great 2017 models. The iPhone XS duo essentially delivered a new chipset and smart HDR functionality. Meanwhile, Samsung tried to pack a little more into the Note 9 than its predecessor, such as a Bluetooth S-Pen and a long-overdue battery upgrade, but this didn’t entice people to upgrade as much as Samsung thought it would.

Then there’s LG and the V40, which offered an industry-defining change in the camera field thanks to five cameras. But the device was, for better or worse, extremely similar to the 2017 model. And when you couple that with mixed critical reviews and an arguably tarnished brand, you shouldn’t be surprised if it misses expectations.

Huawei Mate 20 Pro triple camera close 2

That only leaves Huawei, and it tentatively seems to have bucked the trend by increasing sales over its predecessors. In fact, Huawei claimed Mate 20 Pro pre-orders eclipsed the cheaper P20 Pro in Western Europe by 40 percent. It helps that Huawei stuffed the Mate 20 Pro with features, such as the triple camera setup, reverse wireless charging, a slightly bigger battery, and an in-display fingerprint sensor.

Just this week, the CEO Richard Yu said Huawei expects to grab the first place in global sales from Samsung as soon as this year. Sure, the company is riding a massive wave of momentum right now, having sold 208 million in 2018, a huge 35 percent year-on-year increase. On the flip side, Huawei is the only luxury flagship player that doesn’t have a proper U.S. presence.

Huawei stands in stark contrast with other luxury flagship players (and the larger market) thanks to its current wild success.

Huawei hasn’t disclosed how many Mate 20 Pro’s it sold, and it’s not clear how many of the 208 million units it sold in 2018 are actually low-cost Honor handsets. But the Chinese giant stands in stark contrast with the other luxury flagship players (and the larger market) thanks to its current wild success.

Huawei seems to have proven that $1000+ flagships can be commercially successful endeavors. But consumers need to be able to justify the upgrade over the predecessor or a cheaper device. Simply adding an extra camera or slapping an automaker’s sticker on the device isn’t enough to make it an attractive proposition.

What happens next?

The likes of LG and Samsung will be licking their wounds then, but 2019 is looking like a big opportunity to land vicious blows. The year is shaping up to be a transformative one for the industry, as 5G and foldable phones present a big opportunity for brands to push out innovative (and very expensive) flagships. This doesn’t mean affordable flagships don’t have their place, however. It’s obvious that these phones are good enough for most consumers out there.

Luxury smartphones also have their place, but Android brands can’t put all their eggs in one diamond-encrusted basket. Manufacturers will need to diversify their flagship strategy if they hope to be a success story in 2019. Above all, they’ll need to work hard to ensure that the premium their asking for is justified by the product.

NEXT: What we know so far about Samsung’s foldable phone

Source: Android Zone

The post iPhone XS Max, Mate 20 Pro represent two fates for the luxury flagship appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Alien: Blackout review: A mostly competent FNaF-inspired Android horror game… mostly

Alien: Blackout is not Alien: Isolation 2.

From the trademark discovery, to the expected launch at The Game Awards that didn’t happen, to the teaser starring Isolation’s protagonist Amanda Ripley — fans of the 2014 game for PC and consoles were finally beginning to believe they might actually get a full-acid-blooded sequel to Creative Assembly’s survival horror masterpiece.

Then the first trailer for Alien: Blackout — a mobile game for Android and iOS devices — hit, and in a repeat of Diablo Immortal’s reveal, the usual band of perpetually outraged YouTubers got a bit outraged and the internet on masse mourned the loss of Alien: Isolation 2 — a game that, by all accounts, has never existed.

Editor’s Pick

The game that was announced, however, was immediately painted as a cheap cash in based on a beloved IP that could never be good because, well, it’s a mobile game.

Now Blackout is out and available as a premium, $4.99 title on the Google Play Store, with absolutely zero microtransactions in sight.

As if that wasn’t enough of a giveaway, I can tell you categorically that Alien: Blackout is absolutely a true Alien game, designed and delivered by studios that clearly understand what makes the series tick.

There’s just one problem: it’s not all that fun to play.

Last survivor, again

Alien Blackout review

You know I said Alien: Blackout isn’t a sequel to Alien: Isolation? Well, it sort of is, canonically speaking.

Blackout continues the story of Amanda Ripley, daughter of the Alien franchise’s iconic hero, Ellen Ripley, some years after Isolation’s explosive ending (which I won’t spoil).

After surviving the horrors on Sevastopol station, Amanda (once again voiced by Andrea Deck) finds herself stuck on the Mendel Research Station — another space-faring vessel owned by the clandestine Weyland-Yutani corporation.

Alien: Blackout is a loving homage to Ridley Scott’s 1979 horror movie classic, Alien

The action in Blackout kicks off with the arrival of another ship called the USCSS Haldin, and with it four crew members that come aboard the Mendel to investigate the situation. The four then find that the Mendel’s entire crew (bar Ripley) is dead and that they’ve unwittingly entered into the deadliest possible game of cat and mouse where they’re the mice, and the cat just so happens to be one of the entire horror genre’s most nightmarish creations, the xenomorph.

From its core premise to its visuals, sound design, and beyond, Alien: Blackout is a loving homage to the atmospheric horror beats of Ridley Scott’s 1979 horror movie classic, Alien.

You of course have the titular Alien itself — a hulking, implacable, singular xenomorph based on H.R. Giger’s original design — which stalks around the Mendel’s claustrophobic metal hallways and vents with menace, but Blackout makes sure to fill in the finer visual brushstrokes of the Alien universe — right from the piecemeal title reveal, to the retrofuturistic technology scattered around the station, and all the way down to the CRT-style text and monitors that you’ll be relying on for the core gameplay loop.

Related: Five premium Android games worth every cent

Beyond Giger and Scott, Blackout’s sound designers also crib heavily from the work of Alien’s composer, Jerry Goldsmith, for the string-heavy score that nervously stretches as you wait for the xenomorph’s arrival and screeches as it delivers a final, deadly blow.

You’ll also need to keep a keen ear out for the sound of clanking metal as your extra-terrestrial executioner approaches. The game wisely lets you know that popping on a decent pair of headphones is the best way to play.

As far as crafting a chilling horror experience, Alien: Blackout is far more interested in building knife-edge tension than making you jump out of your seat — a conscious decision that makes sense in the context of the Alien franchise. However, that might sound a little baffling when you hear that Blackout’s primary gameplay influence is gaming’s premier jumpscare simulator, Five Nights at Freddy’s.

Five nights at xeno’s

Alien Blackout review

Stop me if you’ve heard this one before: in Blackout, you need to stay alive without moving for a set number of minutes as you are hunted by randomly-appearing horrors, with your only defences tied to a limited power source.

Also, you can only really spy incoming threats with security cameras, but don’t look at them for too long or it might just appear right in front of your face.

Sound familiar?

Alien: Blackout owes a lot to Scott Hawthorn’s insanely popular FNaF series, but there are several tweaks to the formula here to give the game a more Alien-y flavor.

Editor’s Pick

With Ripley, your avatar character, wedged away (not so safely) in a vent, your main goal in Blackout is to keep everyone alive long enough to advance to the next level and eventually escape the station.

Each of the game’s seven levels are tied to an eight minute timer. Once that timer elapses you’ll lose all power, but during those initial eight minutes you can use up to five units of power at any one time with no penalties.

As your new friends roam the Mendel’s halls you can check around for the Alien using security cameras and close doors to block its path all via a map screen on an in-game display terminal. So far so FNaF, but the introduction of NPCs mixes things up.

After tapping a character’s icon on the map you can order them to hide or hurry up with simple button prompts. You can also navigate through the dark, dingy corridors by tracing paths using the touchscreen.

In addition to this extra level of interaction, you also have access to motion trackers that show a blipping red dot when the xenomorph enters its field of view. If you can’t see the beast at all, there’s every chance Ripley is on the menu, at which point you’ll need to look up from your monitor and close a vent (or vents in later levels). Doing so deactivates the terminal, leaving you completely blind to the xenomorph and the crew’s whereabouts for a few seconds.

Alien Blackout review

If Ripley dies it’s game over (man, game over), but the rest of the crew don’t get the luxury of second chances. Your actions determine who lives or dies and you’ll only need one crew member alive by the end to watch the credits roll. Once you do complete a level with one or more companions, you move to a new area with a completely different map layout.

The first two stages act more like tutorials before the shackles eventually come off, but the game doesn’t actually do a great job of telling you what to do. You have to learn on the job, but rookie mistakes, even in the very first level, can have grave consequences for your four new buddies.

While the layout changes between levels keep you on your toes, the main objectives are always the same — guide characters from point A to B to C while avoiding the acid-dribbling killing machine. There are also no new gameplay quirks past level two, which makes the final third of the game a bit of a slog.

If Ripley dies it’s game over (man, game over),

The only thing that is variable is the AI, and in particular the xenomorph’s AI. In one of the only overall gameplay influences from Isolation, all of your actions in Blackout are reactive to the alien’s actions, as you can only indirectly alter its movement patterns by closing a door here and there.

I’m sure dedicated players will eventually find a way to manipulate the xenomorph’s journey in every level for those perfect, all survivor runs, but aside from a scant few moments where the AI scripting obviously forces it into a specific direction, the alien is an imposing, unflinching, unpredictable hunter, just as it should be.

Structural imperfection

Alien Blackout review

Fans of the Alien franchise are used to disappointment. While you have the original Alien and James Cameron’s more gung-ho Aliens, the Alien movie series has also birthed cinematic atrocities like Alien Resurrection, Alien Covenant, and the braindead Alien vs Predator crossovers.

This vast gulf in quality extends to Alien games too. On the one hand you have Isolation, Rebellion’s 1999 first-person shooter classic Aliens versus Predator, and the criminally under-appreciated Aliens Infestation for Nintendo DS, but on the other you get Aliens: Colonial Marines.

Blackout, for all its good intentions, sits somewhere in the middle.

Editor’s Pick

It’s far from the money-grabbing, microtransaction-riddled mess it was immediately tarred and feathered for by certain vocal quarters of the internet. Instead, what we have is an authentic Alien experience for mobile with stunning production values that retains the core DNA of the franchise’s greatest hits.

Unfortunately, it’s also dripping with unfulfilled potential, most of which becomes apparent within the first minute of the game.

The game begins with a brief chat between Amanda and the Hadlin’s crew, but it’s not long before we see the alien in all its glory for the first time, approaching slowly into the room. This is a problem in and of itself as it removes the creeping, hidden dread that should come with sci-fi ultimate unknowable foe, but what comes next is even worse.

After closing the door, the four characters express their alarm at what they just saw. Mere seconds later, however, they’ve shrugged off their horror and are introducing themselves and their job roles like the good NPCs that they are.

Not only is this atrocious plotting and writing, it also belies a wider problem with Blackout’s execution of a solid premise. These four characters are immediately forgettable, so much so that I can’t remember any of their names despite only having played a quick level a few minutes before writing this paragraph.

Alien Blackout review
Alien Blackout review

What should be a frantic, heart-pounding rescue mission to save your four comrades feels more like a game of Lemmings. You only need one to survive, and with no emotional attachment the other three become glorified meat shields.

Any Alien cast should be expendable, but not disposable. Without a Dallas, a Parker, a Lambert, a Bishop, a Vasquez, or any other equivalent of the many memorable characters from across the franchise, those blood-curdling screams as someone meets their maker remain completely curdle-free.

There are also mechanical issues that stem from Blackout’s other primary source of inspiration. As with FNaF games, success in Blackout is often a case of trial and error where an otherwise perfect run can end in seconds.

When you’ve got four helpings of sentient alien dinners at your command you have some leeway, but once you’re down to just one those immediate resets become incredibly tedious — a feeling compounded by each level’s dull, repetitive objectives. While there are some things you’ll learn on failed runs that’ll help on subsequent tries, at that point you’re effectively brute forcing your way to victory.

Blackout is dripping with unfulfilled potential.

There are also too many things that can go wrong at any one time. The first FNAF, for all its faults, hinged on a limited number of simple mechanics that never overburdened you with too many gameplay elements — a concept many of its sequels failed to grasp in spectacular fashion.

Blackout overcomplicates the formula with various new gameplay ideas, some of which work (the motion tracking fits perfectly), some of which don’t (the margin of error for telling an NPC to hide is far too low), but when all the disparate elements are mashed together, that slow burn, chill-down-your-spine atmosphere evaporates.

Nothing kills tension quite like the need to micromanage four brainless, charmless puppets in addition to the many cameras, doors, and sensors you’ll be switching on and off every few seconds.

Signing off

Alien Blackout review

If you’re a die hard Alien fan and you’re invested in Amanda’s story — which is set to continue in a comic series that follows on from the events in Blackout — then you’ll absolutely find things to like here, including the developers’ obvious respect for the Alien license.

For everyone else, however, there’s already a dearth of great horror games on Android and Alien: Blackout, for all its faithfulness to its source material, is far from the perfect organism that its namesake deserves.

Source: Android Zone

The post Alien: Blackout review: A mostly competent FNaF-inspired Android horror game… mostly appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Which Android skin is this? — pop quiz

OyxgenOS Android Skin

Each of the 10 questions in this quiz contains three screenshots, and your job is to figure out which Android skin they show — OxygenOS, EMUI, Samsung Experience… You’ll have to base your decision on things like the design of the icons, the look of the app drawer, the wallpaper, and the various features unique to Sony, Huawei, and other devices.

If you think you have what it takes to get a good score, click the Start button below and test out your knowledge. When you’re done, make sure to share your result on social media.

Note: There is a widget embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post’s widget.

Note: If you don’t see a Start button, click here.


This is the 26th quiz in our regular weekly series. You can take a few of the most popular ones via the links below or check out all of them by clicking here.

Let us know which questions you thought were the hardest and share your result with others in the comment section.

Source: Android Zone

The post Which Android skin is this? — pop quiz appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Become an in-demand project manager with this 3-course bundle

The Lean Six Sigma Project Manager Certification Bundle

In today’s fast-paced and constantly-evolving job market, trying to identify and train for a new career is no easy task. You can invest thousands of hours and even more dollars in an education that becomes obsolete in a year, and even if you’re lucky enough to find something you’re truly passionate about, you’ll need to stay ahead of the curve with continuing education.

But regardless of the industry, companies both large and small are always looking for talented and trained project managers who can inspire teams, exceed goals, and help innovate new products and services. The Lean Six Sigma Project Manager Certification Bundle will help you get the skills and certifications you need in order to become an in-demand project manager, and the entire bundle is currently available for over 95 percent off at just $69.

Each of the three courses in this expert-led bundle is designed to teach you about a specific element of both project management and more wide-spread managerial tactics and solutions.

There’s a course that introduces you to the Lean Six Sigma methodology through instruction that focusses on everything from cutting waste to inspiring large teams, a course that teaches you how to optimize any business through Lean management tactics, and a course that’s dedicated to teaching you how to gain valuable business insights using Minitab.

Get the skills and certifications you need to become a high-paid and in-demand project manager with the Lean Six Sigma Project Manager Certification Bundle for just $69 — over 95 percent off its usual price.

 

The Lean Six Sigma Project Manager Certification Bundle – $69

See Deal

The AAPicks team writes about things we think you’ll like, and we may see a share of revenue from any purchases made through affiliate links. To see all our hottest deals, head over to the AAPICKS HUB

Source: Android Zone

The post Become an in-demand project manager with this 3-course bundle appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.