Reigns: Game of Thrones review: Worth paying the iron price

Reigns: Game of Thrones sounds like a project born from someone spying the “most ambitious crossover” meme that did the rounds earlier this year and treating it as a challenge.

Editor’s Pick

Mashing up the Tinder-meets-monarchy genius of the Reigns series with medieval fantasy mega-franchise Game of Thrones is such a conceptual stroke of genius you have to wonder why it didn’t happen sooner.

Now that the dream is finally a reality, is Reigns: Game of Thrones worthy of the Iron Throne, or should it be thrown out The Eyrie’s Moon Door? Let’s find out!

Reigns, Westeros style

For the uninitiated, Reigns is an award winning series of games developed by U.K. studio Nerial. Both the original Reigns and its sequel, Reigns: Her Majesty, crown the player as the king or queen of a kingdom full of soldiers, priests, peasants, charlatans, each with their own agendas and desires.

Interactions with your increasingly large pool of not-so-loyal subjects plays out as a series of endless binary choices where you swipe left or right on the character’s card to make a decision.

Each choice positively or negatively impacts your standing with one or more of four factions — army, church, people, treasury. Increase your standing with any of these groups to the max or have it hit rock bottom and you’ll be swiftly deposed in a fatal and often hilarious fashion.

Reigns has always been a perfect series for short bursts of play on-the-go.

In-game years pass by in minutes and, depending on how diligent you are with your choices, a single reign can last several decades or be violently cut short in the prime of your noble avatar’s youth.

Reigns is a perfect game for short bursts of play on the go (online or offline), but it’s also engrossing enough to lose yourself to for hours on end. You can try to outlast your record reign or unlock achievements that carry over to each new ruler and, in the case of Reigns: Her Majesty, progress an overall story that plays out on a much grander, cosmic scale.

Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot

Thankfully, while there could have been a temptation to tweak the formula to accommodate the Game of Thrones universe, Reigns: Game of Thrones retains the core gameplay and structure of its predecessors. This should come as a huge relief, as Reigns is one of the most unique games available on the Play Store, built to do as much as possible with just a handful of simple gestures.

In fact, one of the most impressive things about Reigns: Game of Thrones is how the Westerosi-flavored influence simultaneously feels like a basic reskin of the Reigns experience that supplants original characters with memorable faces from the books and TV show, but also a natural, sometimes bold extension of the series’ main mechanics.

The four factions are fundamentally the same, now based on established parts of the Game of Thrones canon. The church is now represented by priests of the Faith of the Seven, while the Master of Coin and representatives from the Iron Bank of Braavos stand in for the treasury.

More: 15 best offline Android games

While many changes are obvious and simple — you’ll be sitting on the Iron Throne instead of a regular throne and listening to the Game of Thrones theme a lot  — Reigns: Game of Thrones goes a step further. It’s an authentic adaptation that perfectly recreates many of the HBO series’ most popular characters without losing Reigns’ wry, darkly comic edge.

You’ll meet characters like Lord Varys, Samwell Tarly, and Tyrion Lannister as you rule, and each are immediately recognizable not only through their charmingly designed sprites, but also the dialogue.

The game manages to convey all of the traits and machinations of each character in just a few short sentences. New players unfamiliar with Game of Thrones lore won’t be too lost, and fans will be able to savor every nod and wink to the wider story. Just don’t go in expecting any of the salacious sex and gratuitous violence of an average episode of the HBO series. This is still a Reigns game after all.

A Swipe of Ice and Fire

Reigns: Game of Thrones’ biggest twist, on both series, centers on how it handles the main protagonist of each playthrough.

Set in a hypothetical “what if” scenario where the tyrannical Cersei Lannister has been toppled and cast out of King’s Landing, you first take on the role of everyone’s favorite Queen of Dragons and new ruler of the Seven Kingdoms, Daenerys Targaryen.

You’ll soon realize that you actually know nothing (Jon Snow).

Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot

Once Dany inevitably bites the dust you’ll be greeted by the mystical red priestess Melisandre who ponders your fate, questioning whether Daenerys was truly the reborn legendary hero the world has been searching for.

This meta-narrative allows Reigns: Game of Thrones to present nine playable characters, including Jon Snow and other fan favorites, each of whom could be the next “Azor Ahai.” This represents a huge step forward for Reigns, which previously only toyed with the idea of multiple characters by giving new rulers throwaway names and titles.

Reigns: Game of Thrones is an authentic adaptation that perfectly recreates many of the HBO series’ most popular characters without losing Reigns’ wry, darkly comic edge.

While this can make the whole thing feel a bit daunting — each leader has their own allies, enemies, and objectives — the game cleverly spaces out the introduction of new player characters as the broader story steadily unfolds.

Game of Thrones fans can also have a little fun with each new character by either roleplaying the decisions you think they’d make based on their popular persona, or essentially play out your own fan fiction. Want to turn the heroic Jon Snow into a bloodthirsty, war-hungry autocrat? Reigns: Game of Thrones lets you do just that.

No matter who you choose, however, winter is always coming, and the threat of the White Walkers is never too far away. Figuring out how to survive the cold with each character takes patience, strategy, and a bit of luck.

Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot

Reigns: Game of Thrones also introduces branching decisions. These are usually fairly inconsequential, like during small council meetings where you choose one of four people to speak to. Occasionally you’ll see a knock on effect if you choose to go to war or begin or end an allegiance.

During one playthrough as Jon, I opted to off Varys (yes, you can sometimes kill people with a single swipe now) and replaced him with a representative from House Greyjoy to quash a military standoff between King’s Landing and the Iron Islands.

Unfortunately my new Master of Whisperers wasn’t all that loyal and I eventually had to up sticks and move back to Winterfell through another new gameplay addition, travel between locations. Many of these moves are represented by simple background transitions, but others will see you traveling along a segmented path with decisions to make along the way.

The night is dark and full of errors

For all the ingenuity behind Reigns and its adaptation of the Game of Thrones license, a few niggles still carry over from previous entries in the series.

The most infuriating is the seemingly random results of some of your choices. Every now and again you’ll swipe left or right thinking you’ll be appeasing the church or saving money only to infuriate a priest or end up destitute. Sudden deaths and fleeting reigns are all part of the overall design, but some of the more vague, cryptic writing can occasionally lead to an early demise that feels unfair.

More: 15 best RPGs for Android

The usable items of Reigns: Her Majesty have also been jettisoned, which feels like a step back considering how drastically each item could change your fate. Likewise, the story doesn’t get anywhere as weird and wonderful as Her Majesty’s bonkers, fourth wall-breaking plot — out of servitude to the Game of Thrones license no doubt.

Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot
Reigns Game of Thrones screenshot

An essential for Game of Thrones fans

Put simply, if you’re a Game of Thrones fan, this is an essential purchase. It’s easily the best game set in George R. R. Martin’s fantasy world, pinching the mantle from 2014’s episodic adventure series by the now-defunct Telltale Games.

For Reigns addicts, there’s enough new here to keep things fresh, but it also stays true to the DNA of the previous games. Personally, I still prefer Reigns: Her Majesty’s offbeat weirdness, although you could (and should) pick up both games for less than $7 on the Play Store.

Love both? Stop reading this review immediately, hit the button below, and queue that download. When you play Reigns: Game of Thrones, you win or you die, and you’ll love every minute of it.

Source: Android Zone

The post Reigns: Game of Thrones review: Worth paying the iron price appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

HMD Global prepping Nokia phone with Snapdragon 845, in-display fingerprint scanner?

The Nokia 8 Sirocco.

HMD Global is believed to be developing a Nokia smartphone with a Snapdragon 845 chipset and an in-display fingerprint scanner. According to a post from WinFuture.de earlier today, HMD Global is building the phone with manufacturing partner Foxconn and it would be similar to the Nokia 8 Sirocco (pictured above).

WinFuture apparently got its hands on some documents which offered a few details about the phone, referencing it as the “A1 Plus,” “A1P,”  “AOP,” and in places “A1 Plus Euro.” The latter suggests the handset, or a version of it, is heading to Europe, while the A1P moniker clues us in to its potential Nokia 8 Sirocco similarities (that handset was codenamed “A1N”).

Editor’s Pick

The device will reportedly include an OLED panel from LG Display which would support the under-screen scanning technology. Like the Snapdragon 845 chip, this would also be the first time this feature appears on an HMD Global handset. If it’s anything like previous high-end Nokia devices, we can also expect a Pro Camera mode for manual controls, and fast Android updates.

WinFuture speculates that the phone could be launched as the Nokia 9 at IFA 2018 in early September running Android 9.0 (the final version of Android P). It’s all conjecture for the moment, but it certainly sounds promising.

Would you like to see a Snapdragon 845-toting Nokia 9 show up shortly? Let us know in the comments.

Source: Android Zone

The post HMD Global prepping Nokia phone with Snapdragon 845, in-display fingerprint scanner? appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

HTC U12 Plus: Hot or not? (Poll of the Week)

Last week’s poll summary: Out of over 2,600 total votes, 83.1 percent of our readers said fast wired charging is more important than wireless charging, while 16.9 percent said they’d rather have wireless charging. The results were similar on our social pages. 91 percent of YouTube voters, 87 percent of Twitter voters, and 87 percent of Instagram voters all said they prefer fast wired charging over wireless charging.


Judging from initial impressions, it looks like the HTC U12 Plus is turning out to be a necessary step up from the U11. One of our biggest qualms with the U11 was that it looked like a 2015-era smartphone on the front, even though other devices were launching with taller 18:9 screens and smaller bezels. The U12 Plus looks to have finally caught up with the times.

Related

We liked just about everything else about the HTC U11. The camera was superb, battery life was stellar, and Edge Sense provided a useful way to launch apps much faster than before. But how does a company improve on a phone that was already best-in-class?

The jury is still out as to whether or not U11 owners should upgrade to the U12 Plus. For everyone else, HTC’s new phone will likely be a great option if you need a speedy Android device with great cameras. What are your thoughts? Is the HTC U12 Plus worth paying attention to, or do you think it’s overrated? Cast your vote in the poll below, and speak up in the comments if you have anything to add.

Note: There is a poll embedded within this post, please visit the site to participate in this post’s poll.
Source: Android Zone

The post HTC U12 Plus: Hot or not? (Poll of the Week) appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

LG K30 is a low-cost 600MHz (Band 71) phone at T-Mobile

lg k30 T-Mobile

  • The LG K30 is a new, budget-friendly Android smartphone that can use T-Mobile’s band 71.
  • Band 71, otherwise known as 600MHz spectrum, is new spectrum owned by T-Mobile for rural area coverage.
  • The LG K30 has a low price of $225.

Late last week, T-Mobile released the LG K30, which is a budget Android smartphone that costs $225. There’s nothing particularly notable about the wallet-friendly device, save one thing: it supports T-Mobile’s 600MHz network, otherwise known as band 71.

The LG V30, released in October last year, was the first device to go on sale at T-Mobile that supports band 71. However, that’s a flagship device with an appropriate flagship price, which might be over the budget of some folks looking to take advantage of band 71 coverage. The new LG K30 gives buyers a new option.

For those of you who are not aware, band 71 is one of the old frequencies that would transmit television signals. There are few TV stations that use the band anymore, and the government auctioned off the bands to wireless carriers last year. T-Mobile spent nearly $8 billion buying spectrum at that auction, its largest-ever investment.

Editor’s Pick

The reason T-Mobile spent all that money is to increase coverage in rural areas of the United States. One of the chief complaints of T-Mobile service is that coverage is great in cities but terrible once you head into small towns. T-Mobile hopes that band 71 will give the company a new edge in rural areas and help it better compete with AT&T and Verizon.

However, not many phones support 600MHz signal, and most that do are flagship devices like the Samsung Galaxy S9 and Galaxy S9 Plus. The LG K30 should be a popular device given its price point.

The LG K30 has a 5.3-inch display with a resolution of 1280 x 720. It has a 13MP rear camera, a 5MP front-facing camera, a 2880mAh battery, and 32GB of internal storage. Powering everything is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 processor and 2GB of RAM.

It includes a rear fingerprint sensor, a headphone jack, and runs on Android 7.1 Nougat. Grab your LG K30 by hitting the button below!

Source: Android Zone

The post LG K30 is a low-cost 600MHz (Band 71) phone at T-Mobile appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro: Do you need the triple camera?

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro

The Huawei P20 Pro is reviewing very well, making it easy to forget it’s part of a range of new flagships launched by Huawei which includes the regular P20 and P20 Lite as well. The Huawei P20 doesn’t deserve to play second fiddle to the Pro model though — it’s a fully fledged flagship boasting many of the same high-end specifications. It retails for 250 euros less (~$308) than the Pro model — quite a compelling price point if you’re looking for a cost-effective flagship without the usual compromises.

The only major differences between the regular Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro are in the camera department. While the Pro model boasts an impressive and industry first triple camera configuration, the regular P20 sticks with Huawei’s more familiar dual RGB and monochrome camera setup, giving each slightly different capabilities when it comes to photography. There are a few smaller specification differences too, which might be the deciding factor depending on your needs and preferences. So let’s take a look at exactly how the two stack up against one another in this Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro comparison.

Virtually identical specs

Starting with the display, there’s a 6.1-inch panel in the Pro model and a slightly smaller 5.8-inch display in the regular P20. Both feature the contentious notch and a FullHD+ (2244 x 1080) resolution with an 18.7:9 aspect ratio. In terms of sharpness, the viewing experience is pretty much the same, clocking in at a PPI of 408 and 429 respectively. However, the two phones utilize different display technologies — AMOLED for the Pro and LCD for the smaller variant.

Side by side, the AMOLED panel has a slightly greener tint, which is typical of OLED display types, while the P20’s LCD panel appears a little less blue. In terms of vibrancy and colors, both look perfectly good to the naked eye and there’s very little difference between them. It’s only once we run the two panels through our testing suite that we begin to see a notable difference. The AMOLED panel offers up a higher peak brightness at 527 nits, versus the LCD’s 459, making it better for outdoor viewing. AMOLED technology also boasts essentially an infinite contrast ratio, we clocked it at around 10,370:1, compared to just 627:1 for the LCD variant.

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro display colors

When it comes to color accuracy though, things don’t swing so far in AMOLED’s favor. Both phones come with two color presets, the default Vivid, as well as a Normal setting. The default setting with the AMOLED panel sees an average deltaE of 4.9 and max of 7.1 as the color gamut is stretched outside of our target DCI-P3 color space. The LCD panel clocks in a very similar 4.4 average and 7.1 max deltaE but with more inaccuracies in mixed, rather than primary, color extremes. A deltaE average of five is rather noticeable, so these panels aren’t the best out there. For reference, under three is considered quite good.

Huawei P20 Default (LCD)

Huawei P20 Pro Default (AMOLED)

Switching over to the Normal profile generally worsens the color results. The AMOLED panel’s average deltaE increased to 5.9 and its max hit 10.1. The P20’s LCD panel did better, with just a 3.8 average deltaE. Its 8.6 max deltaE was due to some poor reds. However, in this mode, both phones exhibited much better white points, suggesting a tradeoff between stretching for a wider, more vibrant color gamut and maintaining white accuracy.

Huawei P20 Normal Mode (LCD)

Huawei P20 Pro Normal Mode (AMOLED)

Overall, the two panels are incredibly close. Huawei has clearly gone to some lengths to calibrate the two. The AMOLED panel is slightly more saturated and offers better peak brightness and contrast ratios, as we’ve come to expect from the technology. The LCD panel isn’t any better or worse at color reproduction. Both are about equally inaccurate compared to the industry-leading Galaxy S9, just in slightly different ways. If you’re after the technically most accurate display out of either of the two models, the regular P20’s LCD panel set to Normal mode is slightly better. I honestly wouldn’t worry about it, though.

The AMOLED and LCD panels show only small differences in color and are surprisingly similar to the naked eye.

As has become the norm with regular and plus sized variations, the Huawei P20 and P20 Pro pack in the same processing package: the HiSilicon Kirin 970. They’ve got the same high-end CPU and graphics performance, as well machine learning perks using the chip’s dedicated NPU. We benchmarked the chipset and found it marginally outperforms existing Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 powered handsets, but isn’t quite as fast as newer handsets with the Snapdragon 845 like the Galaxy S9. Even so, you can expect top-tier performance with both models.

The phones differ slightly with RAM. The P20 Pro has a larger 6GB pool of LPDDR4 compared to the smaller model’s 4GB configuration. However, both of these amounts are more than big enough for stutter-free multitasking, so this certainly shouldn’t be a deciding factor in your purchasing decision. Both phones also come with 128GB of internal storage, large enough for a major portable music and video collection. Neither have a microSD card slot for expanding storage which is a disappointment.

  Huawei P20 Huawei P20 Pro
Display 5.8-inch Huawei FullView IPS LCD
2244 x 1080
18.7:9 aspect ratio
6.1-inch Huawei FullView OLED
2240 x 1080
18.7:9 aspect ratio
Processor Huawei Kirin 970
Octa-core CPU (4 Cortex A73 2.36 GHz + 4 Cortex A53 1.8 GHz) + NPU
Huawei Kirin 970
Octa-core CPU (4 Cortex A73 2.36 GHz + 4 Cortex A53 1.8 GHz) + NPU
GPU Mali-G72 MP12 Mali-G72 MP12
RAM 4 GB
LPDDR4
6 GB
LPDDR4
Fingerprint Scanner Front mounted Front mounted
Storage 128 GB 128 GB
Cameras Rear cameras:
12 MP RGB f/1.8 + 20 MP monochrome f/1.6
dual-LED flash, PDAF+CAF+Laser+Depth auto focus
4K video recording at 30fps

Front camera: 24 MP sensor with an f/2.0 aperture, fixed focus

Rear cameras:
40 MP RGB f/1.8 + 20 MP monochrome f/1.6 + 8 MP telephoto f/2.4 with OIS
dual-LED flash, PDAF+CAF+Laser+Depth auto focus, 3x optical zoom, 5x Hybrid Zoom, 4K video recording at 30fps

Front camera: 24 MP sensor with an f/2.0 aperture, fixed focus

Battery 3,400 mAh
Non-removable
Huawei SuperCharge
4,000 mAh
Non-removable
Huawei SuperCharge
IP rating IP53 IP67
SIM Dual SIM
Primary SIM: 4G
Secondary SIM: 2G/3G/4G
Dual SIM
Primary SIM: 4G
Secondary SIM: 2G/3G/4G
3.5mm headphone jack No No
Connectivity Wi-Fi 2.4 G, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac with Wi-Fi Direct support
4x4MIMO Cat 18
Bluetooth 4.2, support BLE
support aptX/aptX HD and LDAC HD Audio
USB Type-C
NFC
Wi-Fi 2.4 G, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac with Wi-Fi Direct support
4x4MIMO Cat 18
Bluetooth 4.2, support BLE
support aptX/aptX HD and LDAC HD Audio
USB Type-C
NFC
Software Android 8.1 Oreo
EMUI 8.1
Android 8.1 Oreo
EMUI 8.1
Colors Twilight, Black, Midnight Blue, Champagne Gold, Pink Gold Midnight Blue, Black, Pink Gold, Twilight
Dimensions and weight 149.1 mm x 70.8 mm x 7.65 mm, 165g 155.0 mm x 73.9 mm x 7.8 mm, 180g

As we travel further down the spec sheet, the smaller differences begin to appear. There is the same Category 18 LTE modem, aptX and LDAC Bluetooth audio support, and Android 8.1 Oreo software installed out of the box. Both also don’t have headphone jacks. The Huawei P20 Pro’s battery is notably larger at 4,000mAh, compared with just 3,400mAh in the smaller body.

The regular P20 also makes do with an IP53 rating compared to the Pro’s IP67. This means the regular model has some dust protection and withstand splashes of water when held up vertically, while the Pro model can take be fully submerged in 15cm to 1m of water for up to 30 minutes.

The biggest spec differences boil down to a better IP rating and larger battery inside the P20 Pro.

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro cameras

Do you need the triple camera?

Most of the specification differences are small enough to mostly forget about, especially given the price difference (unless you’re serious about taking your new phone for a swim). The big question is whether the Huawei P20 Pro’s triple camera design offers up enough of a photography improvement to justify its higher price tag.

Editor’s Pick

The triple camera inside the P20 Pro consists of a main 40MP f/1.8 sensor, 20MP f/1.6 monochrome sensor, and an 8MP f/2.4 sensor with a telephoto lens set at 3x, complete with optical image stabilization (OIS). The regular P20’s main camera features a 12MP f/1.8 sensor, paired up with the same 20MP f/1.6 monochrome sensor as the Pro. Both handsets also boast a 24MP f/2.0 selfie snapper and should perform identically there.

The regular P20 uses its dual camera configuration to offer 20MP maximum resolution color images using some clever software, or up to a 2x “lossless” zoom when shooting in the regular 12 megapixel mode.

Meanwhile, the P20 Pro offers up the full 40 megapixel shooting option from its main sensor, or uses pixel binning to combine pixels for better light capture when shooting at 10 megapixels. There are also options for a 3x optical zoom and up to 5x lossless Hybrid Zoom at 10 megapixels. Both cameras also feature the same variety of shooting modes, including Pro, Portrait, Aperture, Night Shot, HDR, and more. Although in the Pro mode the P20 Pro’s telephoto camera is disabled, reverting to software rather than optical zoom.

I took both cameras out for a spin and the results were very interesting. We used the default Photo mode and turned the AI software off. If you want to check out the uncropped images yourself, you’ll find them in the Drive folder here.

Maximum megapixels

Pixel peeping isn’t going to be the easiest here, as we’re looking at images at 10, 12, 20, and 40 megapixels from each possible camera configuration, so frames aren’t going to line-up exactly. That said, we took a look at the 100 percent crops to see how much detail they offered and also to show the whole frame (compressed here but look Drive for the full image) to look at color and white balance.








First up, some tasty chilis. A zoom into 100 percent reveals very little difference between the two models at 10 and 12 megapixels. The P20 oversharpens the edges and details a tad more to make up for the lack of oversampling, which helps the P20 Pro reduce noise. Otherwise, they are practically indistinguishable. Moving up to the 20MP and 40MP images reveal a lot more about how the cameras work. We can see a loss of detail as we move up to the P20’s 20MP resolution, which isn’t what you’d typically expect. This is because it’s the monochrome sensor that boasts the 20MP count — the color sensor is only 12MP. Huawei is using software to mix the two together and the results are passable, but not as sharp as you would expect from a 20MP color shot. It appears closer to a digital zoom effect.

On the other hand, the Huawei P20 Pro’s 40 megapixel image is a native shot from the sensor that clearly captures more detail. However, the image is a little more overexposed (I took the picture several times with the same result). The dynamic range of the shot looks a little worse than the other three samples too. Huawei doesn’t appear to be making use of the monochrome sensor information in the 40MP mode so the picture appears a little more washed out by comparison, but it’s still a very realistic looking presentation overall.






Low light proves a very different game. The P20 Pro performed surprisingly well, while the P20 struggled to even focus on anything but the background wall. There’s a lot more noise in this low light environment for both phones than in the first gallery, but the P20 Pro does a much better at exposing the image and capturing enough light. Compare this to the Pro’s 40MP shot, which is incredibly noisy. The 40-to-10-megapixel pixel binning employed in this camera clearly works wonders in dark shots. The regular P20’s 20MP mode isn’t as noisy, as it uses the monochrome sensor, but the color balance takes a notable red hue compared to the standard shot and it is even more underexposed.

Pixel binning helps the P20 Pro’s 10MP camera capture more light and detail.

I’ve also included samples from Huawei’s Night Mode, which captures multiple images at different exposures to create a low-noise nighttime image. There’s a clear improvement for both cameras when using this mode, so I’d certainly recommend using it when shooting at night. Again the P20 Pro offers the better exposure, lower noise, and superior color balance. If you look at the full picture, you’d be forgiven for thinking I cheated and switched the light on (don’t worry I didn’t).

2x zoom compared

Given the curious look of the Huawei P20’s 20MP shot, it’s worth comparing the native shot to the handset’s 2x lossless zoom effect to compare the quality. I’ve used a favorite example of mine, the record player, as we can compare groove details, noise, and the text to see how the zoom effect alters the picture. For this comparison, I scaled up the un-zoomed pictures in post to compare to the 2x zoom for both handsets. There’s a lot to look at here!






There’s very little, if any difference, between the regular P20’s 12MP and 20MP cropped images when we digitally zoom into 2x in post. It likely goes back to the same reason as the so-so quality in our first gallery looking at the 20MP shooting option — the color detail is only ever resolved at 12MP, so zooming in on the two shots produces very similar looking results. By comparison, there’s a lot less pixelation when we digitally zoom in on the P20 Pro’s 40MP image compared with the 10MP shot.

Comparing the 2x hybrid zoom shots from the P20 and P20 Pro again reveals some interesting differences between the cameras. The algorithm results in almost identical color balance, detail retention, and lack of pixelation when compared to the digital zoom, suggesting that it’s the same super-resolution technique being applied on both handsets. However, the superior noise performance of the P20 Pro’s pixel binned 10MP image produces a notably cleaner presentation than the regular P20 at both 1x and 2x.

The P20’s 20MP shooting mode provides no noticeable improvement in quality, but the Pro’s 40MP option does.






We can demonstrate this further with this longer range outdoor shot. There’s a small improvement using Huawei’s 2x hybrid zoom technology over a regular digital zoom in post on both handsets, but neither is particularly great upon inspecting the 100 percent crops. Again the P20 Pro’s shot is less noisy, exposes slightly differently, and retains a little extra detail. Without pixel peeping, there’s nothing that noticeable. Shooting in the P20’s 20 megapixel mode doesn’t offer any improvements either. On balance it’s a worse choice than the hybrid zoom, as you need to digitally zoom to match the frame. It basically looks the same as the 12MP digital zoom shot.

The P20 Pro’s 40 megapixel mode is the best option for this shot by far, as there’s no need to blow up the picture to match the frame. You can see plenty of extra details captured in the trees and distant objects, and the lack of software processing avoids the painted texture side effect of the super resolution algorithm. The huge range of options makes the P20 Pro technically the better shooter — if you can handle switching modes depending on the scene.

Huawei’s 2x hybrid zoom can’t keep pace with a cropped 40MP landscape shot from the Pro.

Overall at 2x there isn’t a lot to tell between the two in terms of zoom capabilities. Both employ some interesting software that looks better than a regular digital zoom. I’d hesitate to call it anything close to lossless, as the quality varies substantially depending on the textures of the scene.

There are some more noticeable exposure, color, and noise differences between the two. The P20 Pro consistently provides a cleaner presentation when pixel peeping. The addition of the Pro’s 40MP shooting option also bests the company’s own software in some situations, making it by far the better choice for those who can master the flexibility.

Pixel peeping at 5x zoom

When it comes to 5x zoom we should expect the P20 Pro to pull away more meaningfully, given its telephoto lens and OIS capabilities.




With this book comparison, we can again see the similarities and subtle differences between the two cameras’ 2x hybrid zoom capabilities. The P20 Pro doesn’t suffer from anywhere near the same amount of noise. It avoids overexposure on the highlights better and balances the shadows in this scene. The P20 is certainly passable, but it’s a bit grainy and too dark at the bottom of the book.

Once the telephoto lens is switched on, at a 3x zoom or above, the Huawei P20 Pro gains substantial clarity. In fact, this shot is better looking at 5x than 2x, though we can still see how the hybrid zoom algorithm smears some of the text together, preventing it from looking perfectly crisp. The 5x software zoom from the regular P20 isn’t completely hopeless at picking out the text at this range though. You can still read most of the lines and it’s notably better than a standard digital zoom. Regardless, it’s second best to the P20 Pro by a lot.






To close out this shootout, the gallery above best highlights the differences between these two phone cameras. Looking at the full frame, note the warmer tint of the P20’s color profile and lack of depth in the shadows — it’s a very typical difference between the two. Cropping in to look at the grass at 100 percent, there’s additional noise in the P20 shot and less detail. This smudges the grass into blobs rather than picking out single blades. The pixel binning in the Pro’s main camera is clearly working to provide more light and better clarity than the Pro’s 12MP sensor. This isn’t to say that the P20 is a bad shooter (don’t let the super close ups put you off) but the different main sensor specs definitely produce different results.

Zooming into 5x again confirms what we’ve expected all along, the optical zoom of the P20 Pro is hands-down the better option for long distance shots. It’s quite remarkable how much detail can be picked out at such a long distance using its combination of telephoto lens and hybrid zoom software. Again though, the regular P20 hands in a better performance than the digital zoom available on most other smartphone cameras, making it a very viable choice for zooming in a little.

The P20 is a very capable shooter, but the P20 Pro’s camera pulls away once you extend beyond 2x zoom.

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro notch

Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro – Final thoughts

As you can see, when it comes to the Huawei P20 vs the P2 Pro, the Huawei P20 Pro is clearly the company’s headline flagship. In most respects, the P20 is just as good (though those who demand an IP rating will be disappointed).

Editor’s Pick

In the camera department, it’s a headache to untangle all the different possibilities. The bottom line is that the P20 Pro camera is certainly better, but the regular P20 offers 80 or 90 percent of the experience and quality — as long as you don’t zoom in past 2x.

Overall, the regular Huawei P20 isn’t as exciting as the Pro model pretty much entirely because it’s missing out on that extra camera performance and shooting modes. That said, at 600 euros the Huawei P20 is cheaper than most other flagship phones. Its high-end processor and camera punch well above that price point.

Unfortunately, the Honor P20 is not quite in the same bargain category as the OnePlus 5T or Honor View 10. For that reason, it probably won’t ever step out from the shadow of its larger sibling.

Source: Android Zone

The post Huawei P20 vs P20 Pro: Do you need the triple camera? appeared first on TuneMaster.ml.